Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The following model variants were considered.
Several model variants were produced using different estimates of the quality of the water leaving the root zone and contrasting methods of weighting the input data.
These model variants were extensively tested under unsteady and steady flow conditions using the numerical experiments, and USGS laboratory and real-world river application datasets considering the popular MIKE11-AD model as the benchmark.
Other model variants were tested, representing alternative hypotheses about the action of the auxin gradient.
Overall, while the variations in mean deviance (Figure 2b) seen between model variants were much smaller than for the models conditioned on the first infection (Figure 2a), the interaction model allowing for time varying cattle infectivity gave the most adequate fit (measured by both mean deviance and DIC, see Table 2).
Three different model variants were used: (1) a model with a constant coupling distance, (2) a model with a half-normally distributed coupling distance, and (3) a model with skewed-normally distributed coupling distance.
Similar(53)
At last, the different model variants are compared with modeling approaches described in the literature.
AD helps to simplify implementation of the computational code and is much more flexible when model variants are considered.
Obviously, few – if any – of these model variants are available on the market throughout the period.
A few words on the selection of model variants are in order.
Four model variants are compared for each resolution: the content-blind and -aware quality-based models, and the content-blind and -aware impairment-factor-based models.
Related(16)
model versions were
model mutants were
model combinations were
model alternatives were
sample variants were
model factors were
model strains were
model iterations were
model modifications were
model years were
model variants sequenced
model predictions were
model homes were
model parameters were
model improvements were
model residuals were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com