Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
model types were
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "model types were" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing different categories or classifications of models in various contexts, such as research, design, or technology. Example: "In our study, we found that the model types were effective in predicting outcomes across different scenarios."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
7 human-written examples
Three model types were fitted: Type A: Simple national models.
Nevertheless, kappa agreement values for model types were strong and exceeded 0.81; agreement percentages were also robust at 88.4% (See Figure 4).
Results showed that the constant parameters in both model types were impacted by watershed size, which are inherently directly related to the size of the outlet channels.
Science
Both model types were reduced manually (backwards reduction).
These reduced models were also assessed for performance; thus, a total of eight model types were generated and assessed (Supplemental Table 1).
Science
Pairwise comparisons between model types were judged at the 0.017 Bonferroni-adjusted level to account for multiplicity and to maintain the familywise error rate at 5%.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
53 human-written examples
Both countries possess Buk missiles, but the model types are distinct.
News & Media
The fastest-growing part of the S.U.V. market, both in sales and model types, is what Autodata labels sport wagons -- S.U.V's built on car, rather than truck platforms.
News & Media
These model types are described below.
Science
Such "black-box" model types are poorly suited to address these crucial practical questions.
Science
The principles and predictions of other model types are also discussed.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "model types were", ensure the context clearly defines what constitutes a 'model' and the basis for its classification. For example, specify if models are categorized by function, complexity, or data type.
Common error
Avoid shifting tenses when using "model types were". Ensure that the surrounding sentences maintain a consistent past tense to prevent confusion.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "model types were" functions as a subject and verb within a sentence. It introduces the topic of discussion, which involves different kinds or classifications of models. Ludwig examples show its use in scientific and news contexts.
Frequent in
Science
78%
News & Media
22%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "model types were" is grammatically sound and functions to introduce a discussion about different categories of models. Ludwig's analysis, supported by scientific and news sources, indicates its use is generally formal and scientific. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by defining what constitutes a 'model' and the basis for classification. Alternatives like "model categories were" or "model classifications included" can add variety to your writing. Avoid shifting tenses to maintain consistency. Although "model types were" appears relatively infrequently, its presence in authoritative sources validates its correct usage.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
model categories were
Replaces "types" with "categories", emphasizing a broader classification.
the model classes were
Substitutes "types" with "classes", suggesting a more formal categorization.
model variants were
Substitutes "types" with "variants" for describing different versions of models.
model classifications included
Changes the verb to "included" to indicate a listing of model classifications.
various model forms were
Replaces "types" with "forms", focusing on the structural aspects of the models.
the kinds of models used were
Rephrases to specify the models used, adding clarity about their application.
different model varieties consisted of
Uses "varieties" and "consisted of" for a more descriptive alternative.
the array of models consisted of
Uses "array" and "consisted of" to depict a collection of models.
model species were
Uses "species" to classify the models.
the range of model types encompassed
Employs "range" and "encompassed" to highlight the breadth of model types considered.
FAQs
How can I use "model types were" in a sentence?
You can use "model types were" to describe different classifications or categories of models. For example: "In our study, the "model types were" categorized based on their complexity and predictive accuracy."
What are some alternatives to "model types were"?
Alternatives include "model categories were", "model classifications included", or "the model classes were".
Is it correct to say "model types was" instead of "model types were"?
No, "model types was" is grammatically incorrect. "Types" is plural, so it requires the plural verb "were".
What is the difference between "model types are" and "model types were"?
"Model types are" refers to a present or general statement about model types, while "model types were" refers to specific model types in the past.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested