model classifications included

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "model classifications included" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a list or set of classifications that are part of a model or framework in a specific context, such as research or data analysis. Example: "In our study, the model classifications included various species of plants and their corresponding growth patterns."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

SVMs have been widely used in the literature to model classification problems including facial expression recognition [27, 33, 34].

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Racing in several different classifications, including the late-model stock cars and sleek, angular modified racers, is the focal point, but the events have also become gathering places for those who hate to see winter coming.

The New York Times - Travel

Our approach is mainly focused on regression models and in the future we plan to extend it to classification models, including the analysis of model variables in chemical space partitioning.

Journal of Cheminformatics

As shown in Figure 1, constructing the ensemble classification model includes the following 4 steps.

BioMed Research International

Our first classification model (Model 1) included all available variables (listed in research design and methods ) and found that subjects with a 1) HOMA-IR >5.9 or 2) HOMA-IR between 2.8 and 5.9 and HDL <51 mg/dL predicted insulin resistance with good specificity and sensitivity.

Diabetes Care

This set was used to build classification models and included 514 plant, 279 animal, and 509 fungal sequences (Additional file 1: Table S1).

BMC Evolutionary Biology

We extracted three main classes of ground covers from a GIS of the Soil Occupation Model classification database [22]: artificial urban cover (including 54 habitat classes such as buildings, parking or roads), open urban cover (including 14 habitat classes such as gardens) and rural cover (including 15 habitat classes like forest and crop fields).

Plosone

In addition, MiRNAClassify is compared with other classification models, including SVM, naive Bayes, and Random Forest.

BioMed Research International

Note.-The accuracies are reported for several classification models; including, best hit BLAST, the decision tree analysis, SWDAS, and CVAS.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

To achieve extensive comparisons, three classical classification models including SVM [ 31- 33], KNN [ 34] and Random Forest [ 35] were used in our study.

BMC Cancer

We use 5-fold cross validation to compare MiRNAClassify with other well-known classification models including the standard SVM, naive Bayes, and Random Forest.

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a model, be specific about the "model classifications included" to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity. List the classifications explicitly to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Common error

Avoid vague language when detailing "model classifications included". Instead of saying "various types", list the specific categories to improve the accuracy and informative value of your description.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "model classifications included" functions as a modifier, specifically as a post-modifier within a noun phrase. It typically specifies what types or categories are encompassed by a particular model. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "model classifications included" is a grammatically correct, though infrequently used, way to specify the categories encompassed by a model. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It's typically found in formal and scientific contexts, aiming to define the scope of a model. For alternative phrasing, consider "model categories included" or "model types included" for similar meanings. When using this phrase, be specific and avoid vague language to ensure clarity and informative value.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

model categories included

Replaces "classifications" with "categories", altering the nuance to focus on broader groupings within the model.

model types included

Substitutes "classifications" with "types", emphasizing the distinct kinds of elements incorporated into the model.

model components included

Focuses on the individual parts or elements that make up the model, instead of their classification.

model features included

Highlights the characteristics or attributes that the model takes into account.

model variables included

Emphasizes the factors or data points considered within the model.

model parameters included

Focuses on the specific settings or values used to define the model's behavior.

model factors considered

Highlights the elements taken into consideration for building the model.

model attributes considered

Shifts the focus to the qualities or characteristics the model accounts for.

model specifications included

Highlights the explicit requirements or criteria defining the model.

model criteria incorporated

Emphasizes the standards or benchmarks that are part of the model.

FAQs

How can I use "model classifications included" in a sentence?

You can use "model classifications included" to specify which categories or types are part of a model, such as, "The "model classifications included" demographic data and economic indicators."

What is a good alternative to "model classifications included"?

Alternatives include phrases like "model categories included", "model types included", or "model components included" depending on the context.

Which is more accurate: "model classifications included" or "model classifications are included"?

Both "model classifications included" and "model classifications are included" can be grammatically correct, but their appropriateness depends on the sentence structure. The first is a reduced relative clause. If you want to put more emphasis on the verb, use the second one.

What's the difference between "model classifications included" and "model features included"?

"Model classifications included" refers to the categorization or grouping of elements within a model, while "model features included" refers to the specific attributes or characteristics that the model takes into account.