Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
The model predicts very well the flooding limits for air water countercurrent flow through various Mellapak structured packings.
Although the single ANFIS model predicts very slightly better for cluster 3, it is not significant and MAPE evaluation contradicts it.
The model predicts very accurately for the February to November period and less accurately for sowing dates in December and January.
The static assimilation model predicts very high marginal assimilation rates in the initial years after arrival, but in fact, the rates are quickly turned to negative, as employment probabilities of immigrants unrealistically diverge away from those of native Swedes.
The results also show that the model predicts very well the dynamic hold-up of suspended particles, and captures the main features of the radial distributions of the suspended solids concentration and the axial solids velocity.
The model predicts very well the observed transient activity for n-heptane cracking over H-USY zeolite at 623 K and in general, it reasonably predicts the experimental trends for the products distribution.
Similar(53)
The ASHRAE, 2007 model predicted very low dilutions for the isolated building, making it necessary to re-visit its formulations.
It shows that for predicting the statistics of velocity, temperature and major species, both the FSD model and the DTF model predict very similar results for the flames under consideration.
The model predicted very small errors in the prior's mean and was essentially correct in its estimate after the first few bins.
However, the MIROC model predicted very mild climatic conditions for the LGM in this part of the world and thus the distribution predicted for the Pyrenean desman in the LGM was very similar to the present distribution.
Both analytical and linear numerical models predicted very well the critical buckling load for all tubes, and nonlinear buckling model satisfactorily predicted axial displacement over the loading history.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com