Sentence examples for mm of attachment from inspiring English sources

All of the epidemiologic variables were highly significant (p <0.001) with mm of attachment loss at the mesial site having the largest coefficient (−9.841).

Value expressed as mean +/- SD or number (percentage) * Extent Severity Score (3,5) indicates subjects with = 3 mm of attachment loss at 5% or more of sites probed.

The mean percentage of sites probed with ≥ 3 mm of attachment loss was similar amongst the three groups: 3.2% of preterm cases, 2.5% of undelivered controls and 1.9% of postpartum controls, p = 0.33.

Arbes and coworkers classified individuals with at least 1 periodontal site with concomitant measures of 3 mm of attachment loss and 4 mm of pocket depth as having active periodontal disease [ 40].

We also classified individuals with "severe" periodontitis at a higher threshold case definition requiring individuals to have at least one periodontal site with concomitant measures of 4 mm of attachment loss and 5 mm of pocket depth.

The prevalence of periodontal disease (defined as at least one site with 3 mm of attachment loss and 4 mm of pocket depth) was 44.7%, and 36.7% of the study participants had at least one site with 6 mm or more of attachment loss.

Even though, on average, the distances between the CEJ and the defect base and between the CEJ and the bone peak are under the critical 2 mm in the study group, when these were greater than 2 mm, loss of attachment did occur at the sites under investigation, i.e. around 20% of cases.

An assessment of severity based on mm of clinical attachment loss has been provided: 1-2 mm = slight, 3-4 mm = moderate, ≥ 5 mm = severe [ 48].

Each periodontitis subject had a minimum of 18 teeth with at least two non-adjacent teeth with periodontal pockets of ≥5 mm, 5 mm or more of attachment loss, and radiographic evidence of bone loss.

More than 39% of the CSS2 participants from rural Linzhou aged 56 67 years-old were found to have at least one site with 6 mm or more of attachment loss.

Increased thickness of the PF measuring more than 4 5 mm within 5 mm of its calcaneal attachment is evident on lateral plain radiographs of individuals with plantar fasciitis (Figs. 2, 3 and 4) and represents a reliable sign of plantar fasciitis [19].