Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

mistaken for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"mistaken for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used when one thing is being mistaken or confused for another. For example, "He was mistaken for his twin brother at the airport."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Lethargy should not be mistaken for laziness.

News & Media

The New York Times

Sikhs are regularly mistaken for Muslims.

News & Media

The New York Times

He is often mistaken for a dog.

Driftwood logs are often mistaken for gators.

Sometimes they are mistaken for twins.

He was once mistaken for a hobo.

"She cannot be mistaken for anything else".

News & Media

The New York Times

Another was mistaken for someone else.

News & Media

The New York Times

They could barely be mistaken for human.

News & Media

Independent

Many might be mistaken for lithographs.

News & Media

The New York Times

Others were long mistaken for similar objects.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "mistaken for" to clearly indicate when one thing is being wrongly identified as another. It's useful for clarifying potential ambiguities.

Common error

Ensure the context makes it clear which item is being "mistaken for" which. Vague phrasing can lead to confusion about the subject and the object of misidentification.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mistaken for" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating misidentification or confusion. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts, showing it modifies verbs to specify what something is wrongly identified as.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

35%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "mistaken for" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that someone or something is being wrongly identified. Ludwig AI's analysis of numerous examples across diverse sources reveals its consistent use in news, science, and general contexts. While several alternatives exist, such as "confused with" or "taken for", "mistaken for" remains a clear and effective choice. When using this phrase, ensure the context is clear to avoid any ambiguity about which item is being misidentified.

FAQs

How to use "mistaken for" in a sentence?

Use "mistaken for" when you want to express that someone or something is wrongly identified as someone or something else. For example, "He was "mistaken for" his twin brother".

What can I say instead of "mistaken for"?

You can use alternatives like "confused with", "taken for", or "misidentified as" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "mistaken for" or "mistaken as"?

"Mistaken for" is the correct and more common phrasing. "Mistaken as" is less frequently used and can sound awkward.

What's the difference between "mistaken for" and "confused with"?

"Mistaken for" usually implies a specific act of misidentification, while "confused with" suggests a more general state of being unclear or mixed up.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: