minus accuracy for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "minus accuracy for" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing trade-offs or compromises, particularly in technical or analytical discussions. Example: "The new algorithm improves speed, but it comes with minus accuracy for the final results."

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The composite score was calculated as accuracy for misaligned trials minus accuracy for aligned trials.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Further, derived variables such as the slope of the Ratio effect (RT and accuracy for smaller ratio minus RT and accuracy for larger ratio), and Ratio × Congruency cells (accuracy and RT data for each Ratio within each Congruency condition) were also used for analysis.

Behavioral and Brain Functions

He questioned if the authors had substituted accuracy for scope.

The Guardian

So often we forsake what people might call accuracy for the sake of truth or truthfulness.

The New York Times

That phrase "the cost of dying" has sacrificed accuracy for tact.

The Guardian - Opinion

Nabokov could not bear Arndt's "Germanisms," his freewheeling sacrifice of semantic accuracy for rhythmic "beauty".

The New Yorker

"You need higher accuracy for some areas like the goal and offside.

The New York Times - Tech

I thought about the accuracy for two or three minutes and then said, "Yeah".

The New Yorker

Her life is boring and depressing, a feeling the film-makers recreate with maximum accuracy for the audience.

The Guardian - Film

Figure 5 Word accuracy for LVCSR.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Fig. 2 Classification accuracy for filter methods.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing trade-offs between different qualities, clarify what is being gained while accuracy is being reduced. For example, mention the benefit of speed or simplicity alongside the "minus accuracy for" the final result.

Common error

Avoid using "minus accuracy for" without specifying the benefit gained or the reason for the accuracy reduction. Failing to provide this context can leave readers confused about the purpose and value of the trade-off.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "minus accuracy for" functions as a connector indicating a trade-off. It highlights that accuracy is being reduced or compromised in favor of something else. However, as Ludwig AI notes, this phrasing is not standard and can lack clarity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "minus accuracy for" indicates a reduction or compromise in accuracy, typically for another benefit. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it's not a standard phrase and can be unclear. Better alternatives include "at the expense of accuracy for" or "sacrificing accuracy for", which more clearly convey the trade-off. When using such phrases, always provide context to justify why accuracy is being reduced. Found primarily in science and news & media, this phrase signals a deliberate decision where perfect accuracy is not the top priority.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

decreased accuracy for

Replaces "minus" with "decreased", offering a more direct synonym while retaining the core meaning.

reduced accuracy for

Substitutes "minus" with "reduced", implying a lesser degree of accuracy.

lower accuracy for

Employs "lower" instead of "minus", indicating a decrease in the level of accuracy.

with a loss of accuracy for

Specifies that accuracy has been diminished in some way.

accuracy is diminished for

Focuses on the resulting state where accuracy is not as good as it could be.

compromised accuracy for

Implies that accuracy has been negatively affected due to other factors.

at the expense of accuracy for

Indicates a trade-off where something is gained, but accuracy is sacrificed.

sacrificing accuracy for

Highlights the act of giving up accuracy in favor of something else.

accuracy deficit for

Emphasizes the lack or shortage of accuracy in a specific context.

less precise for

Shifts the focus to precision instead of overall accuracy, indicating a slight difference.

FAQs

How can I rephrase the sentence using "minus accuracy for" to improve clarity?

Consider alternatives like "at the expense of accuracy for" or "sacrificing accuracy for". These options clearly indicate a trade-off where accuracy is intentionally reduced for another benefit. Also, think about providing more context for why accuracy is reduced in the first place.

What does it mean when something is described as "minus accuracy for" something?

It means that the accuracy has been reduced or compromised in favor of another aspect, such as speed, cost, or simplicity. This phrase is not standard and can be unclear, so it's best to use more explicit language.

Is "minus accuracy for" grammatically incorrect?

While not strictly incorrect, "minus accuracy for" is not a common or elegant phrasing. It is better to use more descriptive alternatives to clearly convey the relationship between accuracy and the factor it's being traded off for.

What are some examples of situations where you might accept "minus accuracy for" something else?

In machine learning, you might accept "reduced accuracy for" a faster algorithm. In user interface design, you might choose "less precise for" a simpler user experience. The key is to ensure the trade-off is justified.