less precise for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less precise for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the precision of different terms or expressions in a specific context. Example: "The term 'approximately' is less precise for describing the exact measurements needed in this experiment."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

29 human-written examples

The results were somewhat less precise for dew yield, with a larger scatter around the 1 1 relationship.

Journal of Hydrology

Perhaps the most widely used cardiovascular risk score, developed using data from mostly white patients, can be less precise for minorities.

The New York Times

The correlation further improved when analysing the baseline specimens separately (n = 32, R = 0.704, P<0.0001) and was still significant, but less precise for the 1-year biopsies (n = 33, R = 0.384, P = 0.0274).

Stanford University

The United States was predicted to suffer between 0 and 12 deaths and 0 and 30 cancer morbidities, although the methods used were less precise for areas that saw only low radionuclide concentrations.

Stanford University

TOF SWS uncertainty is shown to increase with the square of the SWS, indicating that TOF SWS measurements are intrinsically less precise for stiffer materials.

Duke University

While recall bias is expected to be minimal for rare events such as emergency room visits and hospitalizations, the self-reported estimates may be less precise for common events such as use of acute medications and physician visits.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

For SO2 the estimates for Bangkok were higher but less precise than for the three Chinese cities.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Case cohort analyses were, of course, also less precise, especially for the more frequent outcomes for which the ratio between subcohort size and number of cases was smaller.

Environmental Health Perspectives

2) Less precise annotation for reads and more incorrect annotation for contigs - Even though the reads/contigs are from a particular species, they may be aligned to similar but different species under the same genus or family and thus be assigned to a higher taxonomy level.

BMC Genomics

More bafflingly, the same ruling allowed mutation breeding, an older and less precise method for genome modification involving radiation and mutagenic chemicals.

Cornell University

Notice that the inclusion of OTHER PRESENT actually results in much less precise estimates for most of the parameters.

IZA Journal of Migration

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less precise for", ensure the context clearly specifies what the subject is less precise for. Providing this context enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "less precise for" without specifying the area or application where the precision is lacking. For example, instead of saying "This method is less precise", specify "This method is "less precise for" measuring small quantities".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less precise for" functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun, followed by a prepositional phrase specifying the context where precision is lacking. According to Ludwig, this phrase indicates a comparative lack of accuracy or suitability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

Academia

20%

News & Media

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "less precise for" is a common and grammatically sound construction used to indicate a comparative lack of accuracy or suitability in a specific context. According to Ludwig, it serves to highlight the limitations of something relative to other options, especially within scientific and academic domains. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to clearly define the context or area where precision is lacking to prevent ambiguity. Alternatives such as "not as accurate for", "less exact for", and "less suitable for" can offer nuanced substitutions. This phrase is particularly prevalent in scientific literature, academic research, and news articles where objective comparisons are essential.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not as accurate for

Focuses on accuracy as the differentiating factor.

less exact for

Emphasizes the lack of exactness in a particular application.

not as well-defined for

Highlights the lack of clear definition in a specific context.

less suitable for

Indicates a reduced level of appropriateness.

less appropriate for

Indicates a reduced level of suitability.

less effective for

Focuses on reduced effectiveness in achieving a specific outcome.

not ideal for

Suggests that the subject is not the best choice for a given situation.

not the best choice for

Suggests there are better alternatives available.

less tailored to

Highlights a lack of specific adaptation or customization.

less finely tuned for

Indicates that something is not optimally adjusted or calibrated.

FAQs

How can I use "less precise for" in a sentence?

You can use "less precise for" to indicate that something is not as accurate or suitable in a specific situation. For example, "This measuring tool is "less precise for" microscopic measurements than a laser interferometer".

What's a good alternative to "less precise for"?

Alternatives include "not as accurate for", "less exact for", or "less suitable for" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "less accurate for" or "less precise for"?

The choice between "less accurate for" and "less precise for" depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. "Accurate" implies closeness to the true value, while "precise" implies consistency and repeatability. Use the term that best reflects the aspect you are comparing.

What does it mean when something is described as "less precise for" a particular task?

It means that the method, tool, or approach is not as reliable or consistent in achieving a specific outcome or measurement compared to other alternatives. It may introduce more variability or error in the results.