Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
Within-group contrasts (words vs. fixation, pseudowords vs. fixation) were examined by t-tests thresholded at p<.05 (corrected for multiple comparisons using the family-wise error rate) at the voxel-level combined with a minimum cluster extent threshold of at least 20 voxels.
Common/overlapped areas of the insula-associated networks for the four stimulation conditions were acquired with inclusive masking, at the threshold of P < 0.005 with a minimum cluster extent of 5 contiguous voxels.
The magnitude and extent of temporal connectivity were thresholded using a false discovery rate (FDR) correction of P < 0.05 for the whole brain volume with a minimum cluster extent of 5 contiguous voxels.
This procedure yielded a minimum cluster size of 10 voxels (corresponding to a minimum cluster extent of 280 mm) for the F-maps of the interaction of all factors, 12 voxel (297 mm) for the factor age and 19 voxels (482 mm) for the factor sex.
Similar(56)
All regions shown have nominal association at a voxel-level height threshold of uncorrected p < 0.001 and a minimum clusters extent of 100 voxels.
The Monte Carlo simulations masking everything except the amygdalae, led to a minimum cluster-extent threshold of only 1 voxel.
The Monte Carlo simulations masking everything except the amygdalae, yielded a minimum cluster-extent threshold of only 1 voxel.
The Monte Carlo simulations using the brain mask masking the whole image except for the amygdalae, revealed a minimum cluster-extent threshold of 3 voxels.
The Monte Carlo simulations using the brain mask masking everything except the amygdalae, produced a minimum cluster-extent threshold of only 1 voxel.
A more detailed summary of the results can be found in Additional file 2. The Monte Carlo simulations using the mask masking everything except the amygdalae, led to a minimum cluster-extent threshold of only 1 voxel.
An extent threshold with minimum cluster size of 20 voxels was applied to all analyses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com