minimal losses

USAGE SUMMARY

"minimal losses" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe a situation where few or only small losses were incurred, such as in a business venture. For example, "The company was able to navigate the difficult economic climate with only minimal losses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

"He's been able to pile up the wins with minimal losses".

The New York Times - Sports

The program will unwind over the next couple of years, and minimal losses are expected.

The New York Times

Until now, the industry had been having a year of minimal losses from natural disasters.

The New York Times

"The retreat was planned, co-ordinated and staged, and with minimal losses," he said.

Independent

During Smith's administration, no settlers died of starvation, and the colony survived the winter with minimal losses.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Indians typically sought to engage in battle only when conditions seemed most favourable to success with minimal losses.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

That salt can store the heat for days, if necessary, with minimal loss.

The Guardian

Mike Doonesbury, for example, can be translated into words with minimal loss of information.

The New Yorker

Four days out of port, a German submarine fired a torpedo, and the ship sank with minimal loss of life.

The New York Times - Science

It indicates the minimal loss we can expect over a certain period of time for a given likelihood.

The Economist

"That, most likely, contributed to the minimal loss of life," said Walt Zaleski, a warning coordinator meteorologist with the National Weather Service.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to convey resilience or strategic success, use "minimal losses" to highlight the effective management of resources or risks in challenging situations.

Common error

Avoid using "minimal losses" when the losses are, in fact, substantial. This can undermine credibility and misrepresent the true impact of a situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "minimal losses" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It usually serves as an object or complement, describing the extent of negative outcomes in a given situation. Ludwig's examples show its use in diverse contexts, such as business, military operations, and scientific studies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

34%

Wiki

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Unknown

15%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "minimal losses" is a commonly used phrase to describe situations where negative outcomes are kept to a minimum. Grammatically sound and versatile, it appears frequently in news, scientific, and encyclopedic contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it’s a correct and effective way to convey successful management or fortunate circumstances. When writing, it is important to ensure that the losses genuinely are minimal to maintain credibility. Consider using alternatives like "modest losses" or "negligible losses" to add nuance to your descriptions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

modest losses

Replaces "minimal" with "modest", suggesting a slightly larger but still small amount of loss.

negligible losses

Substitutes "minimal" with "negligible", emphasizing that the losses are so small as to be unimportant.

nominal losses

Uses "nominal" instead of "minimal", indicating that the losses are small in name only, possibly implying they are more significant than they appear.

small losses

A more straightforward synonym, using "small" to describe the size of the losses.

slight losses

Replaces "minimal" with "slight", indicating a barely noticeable degree of loss.

few losses

Focuses on the quantity of losses rather than their size, implying that only a small number of losses occurred.

limited losses

Emphasizes that the losses are restricted in scope or amount.

reduced losses

Highlights the fact that losses have been lessened or decreased.

insignificant losses

Similar to "negligible losses", stressing the unimportance of the losses.

manageable losses

Highlights that losses are easily handled or controlled, often in a business context.

FAQs

How can I use "minimal losses" in a sentence?

You can use "minimal losses" to describe situations where negative outcomes were kept to a minimum, such as: "The company navigated the economic downturn with "minimal losses"" or "The military operation was executed with "minimal losses"".

What are some alternatives to saying "minimal losses"?

Some alternatives include "modest losses", "negligible losses", or "small losses", depending on the specific context and the degree of loss you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "minimal losses" in formal writing?

Yes, "minimal losses" is appropriate for formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and it is frequently used in news articles, scientific papers, and business reports.

What is the difference between "minimal losses" and "no losses"?

"Minimal losses" indicates that some losses occurred, but they were small or insignificant. "No losses", on the other hand, means that there were absolutely no losses at all. The choice between the two depends on the accuracy of the description.