minimal functionality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "minimal functionality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a system, product, or service that has only the most basic features necessary to operate or fulfill its purpose. Example: "The app was released with minimal functionality, allowing users to perform only essential tasks until further updates are made."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

This paper discusses a multifaceted strategy to link NASA Minimal Functionality Habitable Element (MFHE) requirements to a compatible growth plan; leading forward to evolutionary, deployable habitats including outpost development stages.

Acta Astronautica

And there are dozens more like it, with some charging users thousands of dollars each month for extremely minimal functionality.

Forbes

This all means you can stay current and communicate with Paper, and shove your old Facebook app in a folder with minimal functionality loss.

TechCrunch

Trials may include minimal functionality with communication paths between the main system architectural components being exercised for finding a skeletal system for building up the system incrementally.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Conventional wisdom was that Office was impregnable, that an on-demand version with minimal functionality could not stand up to the suite's IT stranglehold in the corporate environment.

TechCrunch

Trials with minimal functionality (the Setting up activity in Fig. 3) are needed for setting up technical development environment and for making sure that everything is ready for release implementation.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

CERN is currently using a minimal-functionality VM-wrapper in C to prototype BOINC applications for LHC physics computing, with an approach requiring very few host<->guest functions.

University of California, Berkeley

Excessive drinkers (AUDIT> =8) were recruited to test enhanced versus minimal (reduced functionality) versions of five app modules in a 25 factorial trial.

Nature

The Adapteva Epiphany many-core architecture comprises a scalable 2D mesh Network-on-Chip (NoC) of low-power RíSC cores with minimal uncore functionality.

Procedia Computer Science

The Adapteva Epiphany many-core architecture comprises a 2D tiled mesh Network-on-Chip (NoC) of low-power RISC cores with minimal uncore functionality.

Microprocessors and Microsystems

"Dear Atlantia Software LLC, We've reviewed your application DuckPhone and we have determined that this application contains minimal user functionality and will not be appropriate for the App Store.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing software or hardware, use "minimal functionality" to clearly communicate that the product is intentionally designed with only the most necessary features, often to emphasize efficiency or simplicity.

Common error

Avoid using "minimal functionality" as a synonym for "broken" or "incomplete". It should describe a conscious design choice, not a flaw or a defect in the product.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "minimal functionality" functions primarily as a modifier to describe the extent or degree of features available in a system, product, or application. As Ludwig AI explains, this is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

35%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "minimal functionality" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe something offering only the most essential features. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and appropriate for use in written English.

While its frequency is classified as uncommon, it appears across various domains, particularly in science, technology news, and academia. It's important to use the phrase accurately, understanding that it denotes a deliberate design choice for streamlined efficiency, rather than a sign of incompleteness. Alternatives like "basic features" or "core functionality" can be considered depending on the context to better describe the intended degree of functional restriction. ""Minimal functionality"" is best used to convey the intentional limitation of features for optimization.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

basic features

Emphasizes the presence of only the most essential features.

limited features

Highlights the restriction in the number of available features.

essential functions only

Focuses on the performance of only the most vital functions.

core functionality

Stresses the central and indispensable aspects of functionality.

reduced capability

Indicates a decrease in the overall capacity or ability.

skeleton features

Implies the presence of a very basic framework of features.

bare minimum features

Highlights that just the least required features are present.

rudimentary functionality

Focuses on functionality that is at an early stage of development or simplicity.

stripped-down functionality

Indicates functionality that has been simplified by removing non-essential elements.

basic operational capacity

Describes a fundamental level of ability to operate.

FAQs

How can I use "minimal functionality" in a sentence?

You can use "minimal functionality" to describe a product, system, or service that provides only the most essential features. For example, "The initial release of the software had "minimal functionality", focusing on core features."

What are some alternatives to "minimal functionality"?

Some alternatives include "basic features", "limited features", or "core functionality". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is "minimal functionality" positive or negative?

The connotation of "minimal functionality" depends on the context. It can be positive when referring to efficiency and simplicity, but negative if implying inadequacy or a lack of necessary features.

What's the difference between "minimal functionality" and "basic functionality"?

"Minimal functionality" and "basic functionality" are very similar, but "minimal" may suggest an even more stripped-down or reduced set of features compared to "basic".