military interference

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "military interference" is correct and usable in written English.
It usually refers to the use of military forces to manage or meddle in the affairs of another country. For example: "The country's decision to open its borders to foreign military interference was met with fierce resistance from its citizens."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

37 human-written examples

"This military interference is unnecessary".

The New York Times

"Military interference, or any kind of interference in Afghanistan, is the same thing".

The New York Times

At the same time, military interference in the affairs of any state is of concern.

The Guardian

The UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, said: Military interference in the affairs of any state is unacceptable.

The Guardian

The West tolerated military interference in Turkish politics, partly because it was told that the alternative religious extremism was worse.

The Economist

The move was welcomed by the EU as removing an obstacle to Turkey joining the bloc, which forbids military interference in politics.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

The military's interference in political affairs was widely condemned by the international community.

Encyclopedia Britannica

For Hezbollah, an alliance with the Syrians meant that it could go on building its military without interference from the Lebanese government.

The New Yorker

He fled from and returned to Nigeria many times and twice turned down a national gong – the Commander of the Order of the Federal Republic – in protest at the military's interference with government affairs.

Independent

In a country where politicians can't agree on a national terrorism policy, opposing the military's interference in politics is a stand embraced now by all parties, from the nominally liberal Pakistan People's party (PPP) to the religious Jamaat-e-Islami.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Prevent unhelpful outside interference, military or nonmilitary," it said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "military interference", be specific about the context and the actors involved to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify which military is interfering and in whose affairs.

Common error

Do not use "military interference" as a blanket term without specifying the nature and consequences of the interference. Provide concrete details and examples to support your claims.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "military interference" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in describing unwanted or inappropriate military involvement, as evidenced by numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Encyclopedias

13%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "military interference" is a commonly used and grammatically correct noun phrase that typically carries a negative connotation, referring to unwelcome intrusion by a military force into the affairs of another entity. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is most frequently encountered in news and media, with secondary use in encyclopedias and wikis. When using the phrase, it's important to provide specific context and avoid vague generalizations. Alternatives like "military intervention" or "military meddling" may be appropriate depending on the intended nuance. Be mindful that the term often implies disapproval, making it crucial to consider the perspectives and consequences involved.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

military intervention

Focuses more directly on the act of intervening in a situation.

military meddling

Emphasizes the negative connotation of unwanted involvement.

armed intervention

Highlights the use of armed forces in the intervention.

military intrusion

Stresses the invasive aspect of the military action.

foreign military intervention

Specifies that the intervention is carried out by a foreign military.

military involvement

Indicates a more general participation or engagement.

military action

Refers to any action taken by the military.

military force

Highlights the use of military strength or power.

military presence

Indicates the existence of military personnel or equipment in a specific location.

military influence

Focuses on the power and impact exerted by the military.

FAQs

How can I use "military interference" in a sentence?

You can use "military interference" to describe situations where a military force intervenes in the affairs of another country or entity. For example, "The international community condemned the military interference in the election process."

What's the difference between "military interference" and "military intervention"?

While both terms are similar, "military interference" often carries a more negative connotation, implying unwanted or inappropriate involvement. "Military intervention" is a broader term that may or may not be viewed negatively depending on the context.

What are some alternatives to "military interference"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "military intervention", "military involvement", or "military meddling".

Is "military interference" always viewed negatively?

Yes, "military interference" typically carries a negative connotation, suggesting an unwelcome intrusion into the affairs of another party. However, the specific implications depend on the situation and the perspectives of those involved.