military intervention

USAGE SUMMARY

"military intervention" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use the phrase when referring to the use of military force to achieve a specific goal or objective. For example, "The UN condemned the country's military intervention in its neighbor's civil war."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Opinion

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Western military intervention.

The Guardian - Opinion

Opposes Western military intervention.

The Guardian - Business

This isn't about Western military intervention.

The New York Times

A third method was military intervention.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Even so, foreign military intervention seems unlikely.

The New York Times

No one is seriously recommending military intervention.

The Economist

Military intervention now will not work.

The New York Times

Netanyahu has long supported American military intervention.

The New Yorker

Would a military intervention have an impact?

The New York Times

Against military intervention in Central America.

The New York Times

"The plans for military intervention are there".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "military intervention", clearly specify the context and the goals of the intervention to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "military intervention" without providing specific details about the actors involved, the location, or the intended outcome. Overgeneralizations can lead to misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "military intervention" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It names a specific type of action involving armed forces. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

20%

Opinion

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "military intervention" is a frequently used and grammatically correct noun phrase referring to the deployment of armed forces into a foreign territory. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is descriptive, appearing most often in news and media, academic discussions, and opinion pieces. While the phrase itself is neutral, the action it describes is often controversial, requiring careful contextualization. Alternatives like "armed conflict involvement" or "military engagement" may be suitable depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to provide sufficient context when using the phrase to avoid overgeneralizations and ensure clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

military engagement

Emphasizes the active participation of the military in a given scenario.

foreign military action

Highlights the foreign aspect and general military actions.

armed conflict involvement

Focuses on the aspect of armed conflict rather than the specific term of 'intervention'.

military force deployment

Focuses on the act of deploying military forces.

use of military force

Broader term referring to any application of military power.

armed incursion

Describes a sudden and forceful entry with military intent.

invasion

Implies a more aggressive and large-scale entry with military forces.

international armed response

Highlights the international nature of a military response.

military enforcement

Suggests the use of military to enforce a certain policy or resolution.

peacekeeping operation

Specifically refers to military actions aimed at maintaining peace.

FAQs

What does "military intervention" mean?

"Military intervention" refers to the deployment of military forces into a country or region, often without their permission, to achieve a specific objective, such as enforcing a resolution or protecting civilians.

What are some alternatives to "military intervention"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "armed conflict involvement", "military engagement", or "foreign military action".

Is "military intervention" always a negative action?

The perception of "military intervention" can vary. While often associated with conflict and instability, some argue it can be justified in situations such as preventing genocide or humanitarian crises.

What factors are considered before a "military intervention"?

Governments typically consider factors such as international law, potential consequences, public opinion, and the likelihood of success before deciding on a "military intervention".