Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
methods were used
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "methods were used" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the techniques or approaches employed in a study, research, or analysis. Example: "In the study, various methods were used to gather data on consumer behavior."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
What methods were used?
News & Media
State clearly whether randomization methods were used.
Science & Research
What methods were used to express these stories?
News & Media
Tells how various methods were used in different spots.
News & Media
Two complementary methods were used.
No statistical methods were used to calculate sample size estimates.
Science & Research
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size.
Science & Research
No statistical methods were used to predetermine the sample size.
Science & Research
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes.
Science & Research
Standard yeast culturing and genetic manipulation methods were used.
Science & Research
Two pretreatment methods were used in this study.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing research, be specific about the "methods were used". Instead of a general statement, detail the exact procedures and tools employed for clarity and reproducibility.
Common error
Avoid vague statements like "standard "methods were used"" without further elaboration. Providing specific details enhances credibility and allows others to replicate your work.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "methods were used" functions as a concise statement indicating that specific techniques or procedures have been applied in a given context. This phrase serves to introduce or refer to the particular approaches taken, as shown by Ludwig AI. In general, it is an assertion.
Frequent in
Science
54%
News & Media
18%
Academia
13%
Less common in
Wiki
2%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "methods were used" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression to indicate the application of specific techniques or procedures. As affirmed by Ludwig, it's suitable for various contexts, especially in science, news, and academia. To enhance clarity, it's best practice to specify the exact "methods were used" rather than relying on vague generalizations. Alternatives such as "techniques were applied" or "approaches were employed" can add variety to your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
techniques were applied
Replaces "methods" with "techniques", emphasizing the application of specific skills or procedures.
approaches were employed
Substitutes "methods" with "approaches", highlighting the overall strategies used.
procedures were implemented
Focuses on the systematic execution of a series of actions, replacing "methods" with "procedures".
strategies were utilized
Emphasizes the use of planned actions to achieve a specific goal, replacing "methods" with "strategies".
processes were adopted
Highlights the acceptance and use of established workflows or systems, replacing "methods" with "processes".
tools were leveraged
Focuses on the use of specific instruments or resources to achieve an outcome. Changes focus from actions to instruments
systems were employed
Shifts the focus to the use of integrated frameworks or organizational structures. Replaces "methods" to systems and changes emphasis to a structural view.
mechanisms were activated
Highlights the initiation of specific operational processes, replacing "methods" with "mechanisms". Changes from general use to more specific trigger.
protocols were followed
Emphasizes adherence to established guidelines or standards, replacing "methods" with "protocols". Changes from use to compliance.
tactics were deployed
Focuses on specific actions taken to achieve a short-term goal, replacing "methods" with "tactics". Changes general practice to operational action.
FAQs
How can I make the phrase "methods were used" more specific?
Instead of simply stating "methods were used", specify the exact techniques or procedures employed. For instance, say "statistical analysis "methods were used"" or "qualitative research "methods were used"".
What are some alternatives to the phrase "methods were used"?
You can use alternatives such as "techniques were applied", "approaches were employed", or "procedures were implemented" to add variety to your writing.
Is it ever appropriate to omit details when stating that "methods were used"?
While brevity can be useful, omitting crucial details about the "methods were used" can undermine the credibility of your research or analysis. Always aim for a balance between conciseness and clarity.
What's the difference between saying "methods were used" and "methodology was used"?
"Methods were used" refers to the specific techniques applied, while "methodology was used" implies a broader framework or set of principles guiding the research or analysis. The former is more concrete, the latter more abstract.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested