Sentence examples for methods as low from inspiring English sources

We assessed the methods as: low, high or unclear risk of bias for participants; low, high or unclear risk of bias for personnel.

We assessed the methods as: low risk of bias (e.g. telephone or central randomisation; consecutively numbered sealed opaque envelopes); high risk of bias (open random allocation; unsealed or non-opaque envelopes, alternation; date of birth); unclear risk of bias.

We assessed the methods as: low risk (e.g. telephone or central randomisation; consecutively numbered sealed opaque envelopes); high risk of bias (open random allocation; unsealed or non-opaque envelopes, alternation; date of birth); unclear risk of bias.

We assessed the methods as: low risk of bias (e.g. telephone or central randomisation; consecutively numbered sealed opaque envelopes); high risk of bias (open random allocation; unsealed or non-opaque envelopes, alternation; date of birth); unclear risk of bias (cluster-RCTs that reported no allocation concealment and RCTs that made no mention of allocation concealment).

We assessed methods as: low risk of bias (e.g. no missing outcome data; missing outcome data balanced across groups); high risk of bias (e.g. numbers or reasons for missing data imbalanced across groups; ‘as treated’ analysis done with substantial departure of intervention received from that assigned at randomisation); unclear risk of bias.

We assessed methods as: low risk of bias (e.g. no missing outcome data; missing outcome data balanced across groups); high risk of bias (e.g. numbers or reasons for missing data imbalanced across groups; 'as treated' analysis done with substantial departure of intervention received from that assigned at randomisation); unclear risk of bias.

She offers such methods as low-level laser therapy and the acai berry to ward off the effects.

Using this method, as low as 7.1 × 10−10 M DNA target had been detected with excellent differentiation ability for even a single mismatch.

Moreover, in comparison to single sensors, the use of an array composed of five optodes (the ones showing the best performances in the preliminary tests) has allowed to reduce the RSD of magnesium determination in real samples (down to 3.7% with respect to 5.5% for single optodes) and to achieve a detection limit (estimated by s/n = 3 method) as low as 4.6 × 10−7 mol/L.

We assessed the method as: low risk of bias (any truly random process, e.g. random number table; computer random number generator); high risk of bias (any non-random process, e.g. odd or even date of birth; hospital or clinic record number); unclear risk of bias.

Many RT-PCR methods such as HIV sequence detection methods detect as low as 50 copies or even a single copy [22] [24].