Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The serious drawbacks of these methods are low efficiency, disposal of waste, low sensitivity, etc. [18, 19].
The major advantages of biosorption over conventional methods are low cost, minimization of sludge, highly efficient at low metal ion concentration and regeneration of biosorbent.
These new methods preserve the accuracy of the original methods and the main advantages of these new methods are low storage requirements and high efficiency.
The efficiencies of all four methods are low with 1 K cores or more stressing a major problem of multi-core systems where the network-on-chip and memory latencies are too high in relation to basic arithmetic operations.
In one case VERA-40499), thentirere collagen in the ultrafiltered control subsample went into the <30 kDa fraction, which is assumed to give less reliable dates, and the collagen yields of both methods are low.
Similar(55)
However, current TDT-based methods are low-powered.
These methods are low-cost, high-throughput, and do not require cloning DNA into bacteria.
In general, enzyme digestion and affinity enrichment-based methods are low-resolution and essentially qualitative.
Even meticulously performed, common microscopy-based methods are not truly quantitative, while more precise methods are low-throughput.
However, the resulting yield from both methods is low and not economical for large scaled production of graphene.
Some other algorithms are based on the features extracted from retinal images, and usually, the implementation time of these methods is low.
Related(20)
methods are weak
approaches are low
methods are modest
procedures are low
methods are insufficient
means are low
methods are small
methods are poor
approach are low
methods are lower
methods are low cost
methods are available
methods are notorious
methods are primitive
methods are shoddy
methods have low
methods are unconventional
methods are superior
methods are soil-free
methods are simple
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com