Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Due to the presence of TiNT immobilized on the pumice, the surface area of the products of both methods are larger than pure pumice.
From Fig. 8, we can see that errors of both 2-D based methods are larger than that of 4-D based methods except for the range d=[60,90] of the method (V).
In addition, the DIF parameter estimates of LR, HLR, and the testlet model are more consistent than the DIF parameter estimates of the multilevel testlet model, meaning that the difference of DIF parameter estimates between the multilevel testlet model and the other three methods are larger than the differences between LR, HLR, and the testlet model.
The biases for all methods are larger in scenarios where the true HR is larger because this reflects a greater hazard of events in the experimental arm.
FDR in Table 1) from MBIS and regular t-test methods are larger than the preset q-values, while SAM methods are usually too conservative and need large q-values to get a reasonable proportion of true positives.
As shown in Figure, less than 55% and 15% matching pairs share at least one or three common GO terms respectively, while the fractions of other methods are larger than 80% and 60%.
Similar(54)
Moreover, the computational complexities of these methods are large as compared to that of global enhancement techniques.
The study also compared the built linear regression model with geostatistical methods (i.e., ordinary kriging, splines and inverse distance weight), generally, the predictions errors obtained by the geostatistical methods were larger than that by regression method.
However, for GY under optimum conditions (GY-WW), prediction differences within GBLUPs and RKHSs for the different imputation methods were larger than for GY-SS.
As with the previous dataset, the classical approach based on multiple sequence alignment performed best; this time the difference between alignment-based and alignment-free methods was larger.
Because 5 of the 11 samples were outside the interval outlined by the lines, the difference between the two methods was larger than could be explained by imprecision only.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com