Suggestions(5)
Exact(1)
These methods are great renovations over the conventional t-statistic based or other gene-level consistency-based methods.
Similar(59)
Variations observed with these 3 methods are greater than variations considered as reasonable in clinical practice.
The advantages of these methods are greatest when residual covariances differ from zero.
N.E.T. and Inner Freedom Method are great tools to help you gain more awareness.
Bias between methods was greater at high PEEP, and further increased when high PEEP was combined with low VT.
Our methods yield p values in the order of 10−3, whereas the most significant p value from the existing methods is greater than 0.17.
The differences between the methods were greater in the promoter benchmark (Fig. 2, Table 4).
Compared to penicillin, differences between the two surveillance methods were greater for extended-spectrum cephalosporins and erythromycin.
The advantage of marker-based methods is greater for selection at a young age, before information on sibs of selection candidates is available.
However, since improvements over the default method are greater for lower passenger saturation rates, adding vehicles at peak hours offers much greater benefits with the adaptive maximum method.
Initially I thought this method was great – let my brain organically make the connections about which conjugation of verb makes the most sense given the context – that's how children learn, right?
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com