Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
methodologically sound
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "methodologically sound" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It means that a particular method or approach used in a study or research is reliable and well-founded. Example: The results of the experiment were deemed valid and trustworthy due to the study's methodologically sound design.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
All are based on methodologically sound science.
News & Media
Not all polls are as methodologically sound as others.
News & Media
Their well-designed, methodologically sound study showed that this was not the case," he says.
News & Media
The reported results are methodologically sound as far as they are independent of the generation process.
Science
They thus ask their peer reviewers only if a paper is methodologically sound.
News & Media
Meta-analyses pointed out the need for robust, methodologically sound, randomized controlled trials.
Recommendations for moving forward with a methodologically sound impact evaluation of campus support programs are discussed.
Wilczynski, N. L. & Haynes, R. B. EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews.
Science & Research
We are methodologically sound.
Science & Research
Trials were methodologically sound, with high retention and participant engagement.
Academia
Eleven contributors present methodologically sound approaches that result in data-rich research.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When evaluating research, use "methodologically sound" to emphasize that the study's design and execution are robust and reliable, enhancing the credibility of its findings.
Common error
Avoid claiming a study is "methodologically sound" without providing specific evidence of its rigor, such as details about sample size, controls, and statistical analyses. Unsupported claims weaken credibility.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "methodologically sound" primarily functions as an adjective phrase, modifying nouns like 'study', 'research', or 'approach'. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates that a particular method or approach is reliable and well-founded. Examples show its use in academic and scientific contexts.
Frequent in
Science
57%
News & Media
25%
Academia
12%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "methodologically sound" is a grammatically correct and very common adjective phrase used to describe the reliability and rigor of a research method or study. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's prevalent in scientific, academic, and news contexts, conveying trustworthiness and validity. To ensure accuracy, specify the evidence supporting the methodological soundness and avoid overstating claims. Alternatives such as "scientifically rigorous" or "well-designed study" can be used to express similar concepts. Understanding these nuances helps writers effectively communicate the credibility of research findings.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
scientifically rigorous
This alternative emphasizes adherence to strict scientific principles and standards.
well-designed study
This alternative focuses on the careful planning and execution of the study design.
robust methodology
This alternative highlights the strength and resilience of the methodological approach.
valid research methods
This alternative stresses the accuracy and legitimacy of the research methods used.
rigorous research design
This alternative underlines the strict and thorough planning of the research.
sound research practices
This alternative focuses on the use of reliable and well-established research practices.
empirically supported
This alternative suggests that the methodology is based on solid empirical evidence.
carefully controlled experiment
This alternative points to the meticulous control of variables in the experiment.
systematic approach
This alternative underscores the structured and organized nature of the methodology.
reliable research method
This alternative emphasizes the dependability and consistency of the research method.
FAQs
How can I use "methodologically sound" in a sentence?
You can say "The study was considered "methodologically sound" because it employed rigorous controls and statistical analyses".
What are some alternatives to "methodologically sound"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "scientifically rigorous", "well-designed study", or "robust methodology".
What makes a study "methodologically sound"?
A study is "methodologically sound" when it uses rigorous and appropriate research methods, has a well-defined design, and employs proper controls to minimize bias and ensure reliable results.
Is "methodologically sound" always a positive attribute in research?
Yes, "methodologically sound" is generally a positive attribute, indicating that the research has been conducted with care and rigor, leading to more trustworthy and credible findings. However, even a "methodologically sound" study may have limitations that should be considered.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested