Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The term extraction method we followed combined NLP techniques, linguistic and statistical filters.
In order to select the optimization solving method, we followed the MATLAB recommendation of use of fmincon function [46].
For the RHT method, we followed the suggestion of the authors of setting the number of point tuples (i.e. pairs or triplets) picked from the contours, equal to the number of pixels of the considered image.
As discussed above, for the symmetric bivariate Gaussian kernel method we followed the convention of using the 95% isopleth to bound the UDs, but also included the 99% isopleth for purposes of comparison.
Due to the large number of sequences excluded with this stringent method, we followed Anmarkrud et al.[ 5] suggestion to identify additional true alleles and evaluated whether the excluded sequences were >1.5% (~3 bp) different from any of the sequences that were identified as possible alleles.
Similar(55)
The method we follow to compute the I-factor is based on physical-layer measurements in the frequency domain, taken with a spectrum analyzer.
Therefore, to asses the performance of the proposed Weibull method, we follow [ 21] and report area under the adapted receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve.
Finally, based on the rigor of the methods we followed, we trust that teachers in our interview study responded honestly to the questions asked.
Using the above methods, we followed parts of two colonies over time to evaluate the change in shrub expansion/contraction in response to prairie dog removal/colonization.
In addition, as indicated in Materials and Methods, we followed previously described guidelines – e.g. the exclusion of samples with ≥25% of dead cells by trypan blue exclusion upon thawing – so as to ensure the reliability of studies carried out with cryopreserved samples [41], [42], [43], [44].
In all three methods we followed the protocols provided by the manufacturers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com