Suggestions(2)
Exact(8)
Finally, based on the rigor of the methods we followed, we trust that teachers in our interview study responded honestly to the questions asked.
Using the above methods, we followed parts of two colonies over time to evaluate the change in shrub expansion/contraction in response to prairie dog removal/colonization.
In addition, as indicated in Materials and Methods, we followed previously described guidelines – e.g. the exclusion of samples with ≥25% of dead cells by trypan blue exclusion upon thawing – so as to ensure the reliability of studies carried out with cryopreserved samples [41], [42], [43], [44].
In all three methods we followed the protocols provided by the manufacturers.
Methods: We followed 2,372 infants born in a population-based intervention trial in rural Bangladesh.
Methods: We followed 8,989 participants who were ≥ 20 years of age for an average of 4.8 years.
Similar(52)
As an alternative to such methods, we follow a newer approach.
As for the two methods, we follow the abovementioned experimental settings.
However, taking into account the drastic difference in the structures referred and present as well as specifics of the applied methods, we follow our interpretation of own results.
In identifying specific research methods, we follow the classification by Grochla (1976) and distinguish between verbal-analytical,1 empirical and analytical modelling approaches.
To evaluate robustness of the proposed methods, we follow the same scenario by Dupuis and Mills (1998) and assume that the 51st observation t 51 was misrecorded as 633, instead of 133.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com