Ai Feedback
Exact(14)
Third, the error method was low, but it does not mean high reliability, so the validity may be not high.
However, spatial resolution of the measurement method was low and thus local strain distribution could not be quantified.
The positive bias for Co and Cr (Figure 1c,d), Cu and Pb < 1000 mg/kg and Zn > 1000 mg/kg (see Additional file 2e,h,l) and the negative one for Ag, Cd (Figure 1a,b), Cu > 1000 mg/kg, Ni, Pb in the range 1000 – 60000 mg/kg and Zn < 1000 mg/kg (see Additional file 2f,g,i,j,k) towards the ICP-OES method was low in relation to the concentrations of the elements.
In the TasP studies, knowledge of this prevention method was low.
However, the response rate to this method was low (see below).
Among non-barrier method users, knowledge about mode of action of their current contraceptive method was low.
Similar(46)
In the spontaneous breathing trial group, the most common method was low-level PSV.
Only spectrophotometric measurement was not influenced by the level of fragmentation, but sensitivity of this method was lowest among the three tested.
In the study by Calus et al. [ 44], difference in the accuracy of estimated breeding values between IBD and regression method was lowest at the highest marker density.
In another study, SPARC mRNA expression using the RT-PCR method was lowest in normal esophagus, intermediate in Barrett's esophagus, and highest in esophageal adenocarcinoma [ 25].
But satisfaction with this method is low, Jupiter says, as customers contend with robotic scripts that send them in circles and give them no easy way to reach a person.
Related(20)
method was poor
method was small
method was weak
method was insufficient
mode was low
method was lowest
method was lower
methods was low
modes was low
method was low level
method was simple
method was innovative
method was worth
method reported low
method was bicubic
method was impersonal
method was easy
method was extreme
method was precise
method was military
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com