Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
Although the overall performance of biclustering methods was low, we also made a similar categorization of these methods based on the type of biclusters they detect.
Agreement between the two methods was low: 80.7% for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 27.2% for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 22.8% for other Streptococcus spp., and 30.8% for vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE).
However, the overall number of trials reporting the randomization and allocation methods was low (18% and 10%, respectively).
Therefore, consistency between the two collection methods was low.
For this strain, we found that the overlap between the different annotation methods was low.
As regards the education gender gap, the rank coefficient between both methods was low (0.36).
Similar(46)
The serious drawbacks of these methods are low efficiency, disposal of waste, low sensitivity, etc. [18, 19].
However, the resulting yield from both methods is low and not economical for large scaled production of graphene.
The major advantages of biosorption over conventional methods are low cost, minimization of sludge, highly efficient at low metal ion concentration and regeneration of biosorbent.
Some other algorithms are based on the features extracted from retinal images, and usually, the implementation time of these methods is low.
At 20% sequence identity the accuracy of all methods is low (below 40%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com