method had more

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "method had more" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to compare the effectiveness or quantity of a method, but it requires additional context to be meaningful. Example: "The new method had more advantages than the previous one."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

DNA based method had more sensitivity, accuracy and resolving power than serologic typing methods [25].

Clinical and Translational Medicine

However, the DNA extracted with the QIA method had more smearing than that extracted with the CLU method.

AMB Express

This method had more obvious advantages: (1) the percentage of CD133+CD44+ cells was obviously increased.

BioMed Research International

Additionally, the incubation method had more homogeneously distributed lipoplexes and a higher number of transfected cells relative to the dried conditions.

Biomaterials

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

The fugacity coefficients from our VE method have more physical meanings than the empirical values.

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Close values of PIOL power are obtained between the individual eye model and the formula, but the suggested method has more accuracy with more functions.

Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics

Compared with the ordinary dynamics methods, the proposed method has more advantages for dynamics design and real-time control of a complex CMS.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

This method has more advantages than the heuristic and greedy methods in that the former could easily remove noise, and the accuracy is thus higher.

Expert Systems with Applications

The comparisons revealed that the proposed method shows improved discharge calculation within 3.8percentt absolute mean error while the traditional method has more than 12.5percentt error.

Journal of Hydro-environment Research

Experiments show that the proposed method has more efficiency compared to traditional simple algorithms of machine learning, as well as several special-to-imbalanced-data learning algorithms.

Neurocomputing

It is found that the type of ground motion and scaling method have more pronounced effects on superstructure response indicators compared with those on isolation system displacement demands.

Engineering Structures

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To ensure clarity, always specify what the "method" had more of. For example, "The new method had more accuracy" is clearer than "The method had more".

Common error

Avoid using "method had more" without specifying what is being compared. This can lead to ambiguity. Always include a clear subject for comparison, such as "The method had more benefits than the previous approach".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "method had more" functions as a comparative statement, implying one method possesses a greater quantity or quality than another. As Ludwig AI points out, it lacks clarity on its own, requiring context to specify what the method has more of.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "method had more" is used to make comparisons between methods, but according to Ludwig AI, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity without further context. While it appears in some scientific and news sources, clearer alternatives like ""method was more" effective" or "method offered more advantages" are preferred. To ensure clarity, specify what aspect the method has more of (e.g., "The method had more accuracy"). Avoiding this phrase and opting for more precise language will enhance the quality and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

method achieved more

Emphasizes the accomplishment of greater results or outcomes.

method offered more

Substitutes "had" with "offered", focusing on the provision of benefits or features.

method provided more

Similar to "offered more", but emphasizes the act of supplying or making available.

method yielded more

Highlights the production or generation of greater quantities or benefits.

method possessed more

Replaces "had" with "possessed", which implies ownership or attribute, slightly more formal.

method demonstrated more

Focuses on showing or proving a greater extent or degree.

method contained more

Highlights the inclusion of additional elements or aspects.

method entailed more

Focuses on the involvement or necessity of additional steps or resources.

method encompassed more

Emphasizes the inclusion of a wider range or scope.

method involved more

Highlights the inclusion of additional steps, phases, or parameters in carrying out the method.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "method had more" to be more grammatically correct?

You can rephrase it as "the method was more effective", "the method offered more benefits", or "the method provided more accuracy". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is "method had more" grammatically correct?

Ludwig AI indicates that "method had more" is not grammatically correct and lacks clarity. It is generally better to use more precise phrasing. For example, "the "method was more" efficient".

What's a more formal alternative to "method had more"?

A more formal alternative could be "the method possessed a greater capacity" or "the method demonstrated superior performance". These alternatives sound more professional and are suitable for academic or business writing.

Which is better: "method had more advantages" or "method offered more advantages"?

"Method offered more advantages" is generally better because it uses a more active and descriptive verb. While "method had more advantages" is understandable, "method offered more advantages" provides a clearer understanding of the method's capabilities.