Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

method was more

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "method was more" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used when comparing the effectiveness or quality of a method to another, often in a comparative context. Example: "In the study, the method was more effective than the traditional approach in achieving the desired results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Mr. Dimon said that he was told that the thinking of the executives involved in the trade was that the chosen method was more cost-efficient.

News & Media

The New York Times

Until recently the progress of geodetic triangulation, the basic survey method, was more or less limited to areas either covered by good topographic maps or scheduled for mapping.

The pulse-delay photoactivation method was more effective for Filtek Z350 compared to Filtek Silorane.

This all implies that LC-MS/MS method was more sensitive than Delvotest SP-NT.

In the EE of DOX, AS-gradient method was more effective than pH gradient.

It is important that the logistics cost in this method was more than two other functions.

The host-based method was more precise and feasible in a controlled environment.

Finally, the survey method was more common than the other two methods.

The (tau_{p}^{ hbox{max} } -based method was more precise for earthquakes with (M <) 5.

The results indicated that the NMAE method was more effective than the SE method.

Science

Fuel

The results indicated that this integrated method was more efficient than enumerative search algorithm.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "method was more", ensure you clearly state what it is being compared to for clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid using "method was more" without specifying the alternative method being compared. Without a clear comparison, the statement lacks context and impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "method was more" primarily functions as a comparative statement. It indicates that one method possesses a greater degree of a certain quality or effectiveness than another. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and commonly used to compare methodologies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

72%

News & Media

19%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "method was more" is a grammatically correct and frequently used comparative expression, particularly within scientific and technical contexts. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is suitable for use in written English to highlight the relative effectiveness of one approach over another. When employing this phrase, clarity is key; ensure you specify the methods being compared to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "approach proved superior" or "technique demonstrated greater efficiency". These insights, combined with an understanding of potential errors, will help you use "method was more" effectively in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "method was more" in a sentence?

Use "method was more" to compare the effectiveness of one approach against another, as in "The new "method" was more efficient than the traditional one."

What are some alternatives to "method was more"?

You could use phrases like "approach proved superior", "technique demonstrated greater efficiency", or "strategy yielded better results" as alternatives.

Is it always necessary to specify what a method is being compared to when using "method was more"?

Yes, it's crucial for clarity. Saying "method was more" without context leaves the comparison ambiguous. For example, specify "the new method was more effective than the old method".

What makes a method 'more' effective, and how can it be quantified?

Effectiveness can be determined by factors like time saved, resources conserved, or improved outcomes. It's quantified using metrics specific to the context, such as "time to completion" or "error rate".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: