Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

method for concluding

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "method for concluding" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific approach or technique for reaching a conclusion in various contexts, such as research, writing, or decision-making. Example: "In this study, we will outline a method for concluding our findings effectively to ensure clarity and impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Formal & Business

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Voros et al. used a partially digitised counting method for Ki67, and concluded that such a technique was faster, more convenient and would significantly improve the reproducibility of using Ki67 as a proliferation marker in breast cancer [ 29].

Science

BMC Cancer

By a similar method, we conclude the following results for (GVVI) and (VVI), respectively.

Hardcastle et al. [30], using the diatomic approximation method, concluded that for an ideal WO4 unit, the shortest W-O bond should correspond to a Raman fingerprint located at 874 cm-1 (νs(W=O)), with a standard deviation of approximately 55 cm-1.

Earlier studies in laying hens using a similar method for determining N2O production, concluded that production was either negligible or undetectable [7], [40].

Science

Plosone

On the other hand, Villanueva et al. (2011) developed a version of the BayesB method for dichotomous traits and concluded that the threshold BayesB method improves GS accuracy when disease-resistant dichotomous phenotypes are encountered, compared with accuracies obtained with the linear model.

This paper gives a critical review on these methods and concludes that, for thin films, the energy-based approach, especially the one independent of substrate, is more advantageous.

With the evaluation of Hwang and Yung (2003) and Hwang et al. (2005, 2012), the better performance of the Seed method has been concluded and suggested for practical soil liquefaction evaluation.

Dinu et al. [ 24] compared the type I error rates and powers for the three methods and concluded that LCT approach is powerful and computationally attractive.

The algorithm proposed has been compared to an empirical RTT-based and RSS-based localization algorithms and to the RWGH method for mitigating the NLOS effect, concluding that the localization system gives the best results without any tracking technique help that could improve the positioning accuracy.

The previously reported differences between these two methods are minor, and the methods were concluded to be equivalent for neuro-signals (Quian Quiroga et al. 2002).

They enable to obtain information, unattainable with other methods, being of importance for further concluding on those hazards.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "method for concluding", ensure the context clearly defines the specific procedure or approach being referenced. This adds clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "method for concluding" when a more specific term like "analysis" or "experiment" would better describe the actual process. Overgeneralization can weaken the impact of your writing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

68%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "method for concluding" functions as a noun phrase, specifying a particular process or technique used to arrive at a conclusion. It typically serves to introduce or describe the methodology employed in a study, analysis, or decision-making process. Ludwig AI validates its usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "method for concluding" is grammatically correct and suitable for formal contexts, particularly in academic and scientific writing, where it is used to specify a process or technique for reaching a conclusion. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and while the phrase itself has no specific instances in the provided data, alternative phrases like "approach to concluding" and "technique for concluding" offer similar meanings. When using this phrase, clarity and precision are key to ensuring the intended meaning is effectively conveyed.

FAQs

How can I use "method for concluding" in a sentence?

You can use "method for concluding" to describe a specific approach or procedure used to reach a conclusion, such as "The study outlines a new "method for concluding" the effectiveness of the treatment."

What are some alternatives to "method for concluding"?

Some alternatives include "approach to concluding", "way of concluding", or "technique for concluding", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is there a difference between a "method for concluding" and an "approach to concluding"?

While similar, ""method for concluding"" often implies a more structured and systematic procedure, whereas "approach to concluding" can be more general and less formalized.

When is it appropriate to use "method for concluding" in formal writing?

It is appropriate in contexts where you need to emphasize the specific procedure or systematic process used to arrive at a conclusion, particularly in scientific, academic, or formal reports.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

68%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: