Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

mentioned for completeness

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mentioned for completeness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to indicate that a piece of information is included to ensure thoroughness, even if it may not be essential to the main point. Example: "The following details are mentioned for completeness: the project's timeline, budget, and team members involved."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Defocus - this option is not recommended and is only mentioned for completeness.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

We mention for completeness that multisite phosphorylation with saturation kinetics at each modification step can lead to bistability even in the absence of feedback [ 22, 23].

The rest of the paper focuses on the core elements of the LADM; external classes are out of the scope but mentioned for the completeness of the model.

The last call in the group is loop, and I mention it here for completeness, and to contrast it with run.

We mention this only for completeness because, in the multiple testing scenarios we consider herein, the P values for the individual comparisons are so small that adjusting for multiple comparisons will not affect the conclusions presented.

There are a number of other biases worth mentioning for the sake of clarity and completeness.

In a footnote, Weyl (1924c) sarcastically informed Study that "even if he [Weyl] had been as well versed as Study in the theory of invariants, he would not have used the symbolic method in his book Raum, Zeit, Materie and even with the last breath of his life would not have mentioned the algebraic completeness theorem for invariant theory".

Science

SEP

The most mentioned reason was striving for completeness in order to get an overall picture of the child's abilities.

Let us then also mention the completeness of related theories by Nishimura [1979] and Vakarelov [1983].

Science

SEP

For completeness, we mention here that other projects have also invested effort in standardising ontologies for computational materials science simulations, especially for atomistic and/or DFT-based methods.

For completeness we mention additional statistical analyses that are not the primary focus of this article.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "mentioned for completeness" to signal to your reader that certain information is included for thoroughness, but might not be essential to the core argument. This enhances transparency and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "mentioned for completeness" too frequently, as it can make your writing seem hesitant or disorganized. Reserve it for instances where the added detail truly contributes to a fuller understanding.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mentioned for completeness" serves as a discourse marker. It signals that the following information is supplementary, adding thoroughness to the discussion but not crucial for the main argument. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

58%

Academia

21%

News & Media

21%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "mentioned for completeness" is a phrase used to signal that information is included for thoroughness rather than necessity. It's grammatically sound and often found in academic and scientific contexts. Ludwig AI validates its proper usage, confirming it enhances transparency and credibility by assuring the audience that relevant aspects have been considered. While effective, overuse can make writing seem hesitant; it's best reserved for details that genuinely contribute to a fuller understanding. Alternatives like "included for thoroughness" can be used for variety.

FAQs

What does "mentioned for completeness" mean?

It means that something is included in a discussion or document to ensure that all relevant information is covered, even if it's not strictly necessary for the main point.

When is it appropriate to use "mentioned for completeness"?

Use it when adding details that are helpful for a full understanding but are not crucial to the central argument. It's appropriate when striving for thoroughness without distracting from the main topic.

Are there alternatives to saying "mentioned for completeness"?

Yes, you can use alternatives like "included for thoroughness", "added for the sake of completeness", or "provided for completeness" depending on the context.

How can I use "mentioned for completeness" in a sentence?

For example, "The following details are "mentioned for completeness": the project's timeline, budget, and team members involved."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: