Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

mentioned for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "mentioned for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone has been identified or brought up in a discussion with the expectation of receiving some recognition or award. For example, "John was mentioned for the best teacher of the year award, but he didn't win."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Tuition fees aren't mentioned for a start.

News & Media

The Guardian

No release date has been mentioned for the technology.

His name was mentioned for higher-profile, better-paying jobs.

"I just as soon not even be mentioned for it.

That nickname had been mentioned for the first time.

We've just heard Kljestan's name mentioned for the first time.

And those glasses I mentioned for a schoolchild?

News & Media

The New York Times

Several American radar installations have been mentioned for study.

News & Media

The New York Times

I didn't like it, never mentioned for any of the other movies.

If I'm mentioned for a job in England, they call me an Englishman.

Mr. Stewart was widely mentioned for two network late-night jobs in recent years.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "mentioned for" when you want to indicate that someone or something has been identified or brought up in a discussion, often with the expectation of future consideration or recognition.

Common error

Avoid substituting other prepositions for "for" as it changes the meaning. "Mentioned in" indicates where something was mentioned, while "mentioned to" indicates to whom it was mentioned, differing from the sense of consideration or recognition implied by "mentioned for".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "mentioned for" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject has been brought up in a discussion or context with the expectation of consideration or recognition. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and widespread usage of this construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Science

32%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "mentioned for" is a grammatically correct and widely used construction that indicates consideration or recognition for a specific purpose. As highlighted by Ludwig, it appears frequently in news, scientific, and general contexts. To ensure clarity and accuracy, avoid substituting "for" with other prepositions that might alter the intended meaning. While versatile, always consider the surrounding tone to maintain consistency. When looking for alternatives, "considered for", "nominated for", and "recommended for" offer viable options depending on the context.

FAQs

How is "mentioned for" typically used in a sentence?

Typically, "mentioned for" is used to indicate that someone or something has been identified or brought up in a discussion with the expectation of receiving some recognition, award, or consideration. For example, "She was "mentioned for" her outstanding contributions to the team."

What are some alternatives to "mentioned for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "considered for", "nominated for", or "recommended for". Each of these carries a slightly different nuance regarding the purpose or level of formality.

Is it correct to say "mentioned in" instead of "mentioned for"?

While both are grammatically correct, they have different meanings. "Mentioned in" refers to the location or medium where something was mentioned, while ""mentioned for"" implies consideration or recognition for something.

Can "mentioned for" be used in formal and informal contexts?

Yes, ""mentioned for"" is versatile and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, be mindful of the surrounding language and tone to ensure it fits the overall style.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: