meets the sceptics

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "meets the sceptics" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a situation where someone or something encounters or engages with skeptics or doubters. Example: "The new theory meets the sceptics head-on, addressing their concerns with solid evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

He meets the sceptics head on.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

This obviously won't satisfy the sceptics.

The Guardian - Film

The sceptics reckoned it could not meet the tests for membership.

The Economist

Hurry up Less separate, more equal Dirt all round A moving story Taxing matters Slavic symbolism ReprintsThe sceptics insist that even the latest bout of fiscal flagellation will not enable Italy to meet the Maastricht target.

The Economist

Sceptics also question how a fund that may buy at most ¥2 trillion $16.1 billionn) of shares can help banks make the ¥13 trillion or so of share sales needed to meet the new limitations.

The Economist

In this way the threat of wholesale scepticism urged by the Sceptics was met by the limited scepticism arising from our inability to know the precise boundaries to knowledge.

SEP

She skirts around the question of Jesus's miracles (though Judas, in his narrative, meets a Roman sceptic who shows him how certain "healers" tricks are effected) and his sanity.

The Guardian - Books

Just at the end of the lane near Sohan Lal's teashop I meet a sceptic.

BBC

Cabinet ministers have been encouraged to meet sceptics, discover what it is precisely they object to in the forthcoming legislation and to see if they can find common ground.For example, MPs are worried that greater autonomy for schools will mean more backdoor selection and a worse deal for pupils from poor backgrounds.

The Economist

In response to the sceptics' concerns, Europe's agriculture ministers met on June 23rd to hammer out a compromise that will allow any country that feels it cannot replace a particular pesticide to ask permission to continue to use it.

The Economist

After exhaustive analysis, the IEA concludes that the sceptics are wrong: there is more than enough oil in the ground to meet expected demand beyond 2030.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "meets the sceptics", ensure you clearly identify who or what is doing the "meeting" and the specific context of the skepticism.

Common error

Avoid using "meets the sceptics" without specifying which sceptics are being referred to. Vague references can weaken your argument. Instead, be specific about the group or individuals holding the skeptical views.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "meets the sceptics" functions as a verbal phrase indicating an interaction or encounter with individuals who hold doubts or reservations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's usable in written English. It often implies addressing, confronting, or engaging with these skeptical viewpoints.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

22%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "meets the sceptics" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe an encounter with or a response to skeptical viewpoints. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in English writing. It's most commonly found in news and media contexts, suggesting a neutral register. While the phrase itself is straightforward, effective use requires clearly identifying the sceptics and the context of their skepticism. Alternatives like "addresses the doubters" or "confronts the skeptics" can be considered depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

addresses the doubters

Replaces "sceptics" with "doubters", focusing on those who question or lack belief.

confronts the skeptics

Uses "confronts" to imply a more direct and potentially challenging interaction with skeptics.

faces the critics

Replaces "sceptics" with "critics", broadening the scope to include any form of opposition or disapproval.

engages with the cynics

Uses "cynics" instead of "sceptics", emphasizing a pessimistic or distrustful outlook.

responds to the opposition

Offers a more general alternative, referring to those who are against a particular idea or plan.

counters the arguments of the skeptics

Focuses on addressing the specific arguments or points raised by skeptics.

tackles the reservations

Highlights the act of dealing with doubts or hesitations that sceptics might have.

answers the concerns of the skeptics

Specifically addresses worries or apprehensions expressed by skeptics.

takes on the disbelievers

Replaces "sceptics" with "disbelievers", emphasizing a lack of faith or acceptance.

rebuts the objections of the skeptics

Refers to formally denying or proving that specific objections from skeptics are false.

FAQs

How can I use "meets the sceptics" in a sentence?

You can use "meets the sceptics" to describe how a person, idea, or proposal confronts or addresses doubt. For example, "The new policy "meets the sceptics" head-on by providing clear data and addressing their key concerns."

What's a more formal alternative to "meets the sceptics"?

A more formal alternative is "addresses the concerns of the skeptics". This phrase is suitable for academic or professional contexts where a neutral tone is preferred.

Is it better to say "meets the skeptics" or "confronts the skeptics"?

The choice between "meets the skeptics" and "confronts the skeptics" depends on the context. "Meets" implies addressing or encountering skepticism, while "confronts" suggests a more direct or challenging approach.

Can "meets the sceptics" be used in a positive or negative context?

"Meets the sceptics" can be used in both positive and negative contexts. Positively, it can describe successfully addressing concerns. Negatively, it can describe a failure to convince or persuade those who are skeptical.