Sentence examples for measures of neglect from inspiring English sources

Interestingly, it appears that bisection deficits dissociate from other measures of neglect (including search tasks), and neglect patients with bisection deficits typically have more posterior injury than those without these symptoms.

Special acknowledgment is due to Jianping Pan for providing the measures of neglect subtypes.

In the current study, we found no significant correlations with performance on our tasks and simple bedside clinical measures of neglect.

In addition, it would be crucial to examine the impact of the drug on everyday life, using functional outcome measures: activities of daily living and functional measures of neglect (Azouvi et al., 2003).

No significant correlations were found between any of the standard measures of neglect (Mesulam Shape cancellation, BIT star cancellation or line bisection) and performance on either the spatial and non-spatial sustained attention tasks (where performance indices were total errors, omissions, commissions and decline in any of these parameters over the duration of the task).

CancellationTools is already useful to clinicians, as it provides quantitative data on established measures of neglect (e.g., number of omissions), as well as qualitative data that provides better insight in patient behavior than pen-and-paper cancellation tests (e.g., cancellation path plots).

The CoC is a very elegant measure of neglect severity, as it captures an attentional gradient rather than a bimodal decision (i.e., left field is or is not impaired).

Whilst procedure neglect refers to the objective measures of patient neglect (e.g. not feeding patients) that might result from error, abuse, or lack of caring, caring neglect attempts to capture the subjective and emotional aspects of poor care.

In another fMRI study, patients with MDD and a history of childhood maltreatment showed reduced functional connectivity strength within the prefrontal-limbic-thalamic-cerebellar circuitry and these reductions were significantly correlated with measures of childhood neglect [ 230].

The Dental Neglect Scale (DNS) has been found to be a valid measure of dental neglect in samples of children and adults, and may be valid for adolescents as well.

However, such proposals are based on measures of association that neglect individual heterogeneity around group averages and thereby the discriminatory accuracy (DA) of the categories used (i.e. their ability to discriminate the individuals with poor and good SRH, respectively).