Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
The solid and dash lines in Figure 4a are the SHCs of the molten salt measured using model Q20 of TA and model 7020 of EXSTAR, respectively.
The cross mark data at 0 vol.% in Figure 5 is the SHC of the molten salt without doping with NPs (measured using model Q20 of TA).
The cross mark at 0 vol.% is the SHC of the molten salt without doping with NPs (measured using model Q20 of TA).
The SHCs of NPs were measured using model 7020 of EXSTAR while the values of the SHCs of the bulk alumina were taken from Ginnings and Furukawa [16].
The 290°C to 335°C temperature-averaged SHCs of the molten salt measured using model Q20 of TA and model 7020 of EXSTAR are similar (1.59 ± 0.031 and 1.60 ± 0.012 kJ/kg-K, respectively).
The Debye temperature decreases with reducing particle size [17], resulting in an increased SHC. Figure 4c shows the SHCs of solid salt and solid salt doped with 13-nm and 90-nm alumina NPs at 0.9, 2.7, and 4.6 vol.%, respectively (measured using model 7020 of EXSTAR).
Similar(52)
Turbidity was measured using AquaFluor model 8000-010 instrument.
Magnetic remanence was measured using a Model ASPIN spinner magnetometer (Natsuhara Giken).
pH of homogenate was measured using a Model Docu-pH Meter (Sartorius AG, Gottingen, Germany).
The TRM intensities (M TRM) of the remaining 12 crystals were measured using the model 755 cryogenic magnetometer at CMCR, Kochi University.
Nanofluid electrical conductivity was measured using a Model 72 handheld conductivity meter from Engineered Systems and Designs, Inc. (Newark, DE, USA).
Related(18)
assessed using model
compared using model
estimated using model
evaluated using model
calculated using model
demonstrated using model
measured using models
measured using rain
measured using photogrammetry
measured using water
measured using echocardiography
measured using police
measured using mass
measured using spectrophotometer
measured using inversion
measured using biophotometer
measured using pyranometer
measured using matrix
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com