Sentence examples for mean errors are from inspiring English sources

As can be seen, for both techniques the mean errors are smaller for higher partials.

The relative mean errors are 0.11% (kinematic viscosity), 0.01% (surface tension) and 0.015% (density).

The mean errors are found to vary from 0 m on flat terrains to −0.9 m on slopes of 80° (Fig. 2).

Further tests indicate that the correlations of Nusselt and Sherwood number on air side of the unit agree well with the test results, and the mean errors are about ±10%and±12%2%, respectively.

The Fig. 5(a) shows the normal probability plots of the residual for TWR, which indicate that all the residuals lie on the straight line mean errors are normally allocated.

At last, the mean errors of the gene based methods (GCtotal, GC1-GC3 and CU.KL) are usually quite high – mean errors are respectively 41%, 53% and 28% – and vary considerably – mean standard deviations are respectively 37 %, 26 % and 21– according to HT origin.

Experiments were performed 3 times, and mean errors were determined.

Quantification of [S] incorporation was performed a total of 3-time, and mean errors were derived.

Overall, the global mean errors were significantly lower than the expected error, which is 342/684, that is, 50%.

The mean errors were assessed as mean of the residuals within each paired measurements divided by the average of the paired measurements.

The root mean squared error and residual mean error are 1.6 and −0.66 m respectively.