Sentence examples for mean booth coverage from inspiring English sources

For this reason, we provide the district level values for mean booth coverage for CMC areas vs. Non-CMC areas.

In each district, the mean booth coverage in CMC areas is higher than in non-CMC areas.

In Figure 1, we compare mean booth coverage between CMC and non-CMC areas for each district.

In all districts, the CMC areas had significantly higher mean booth coverage than in non-CMC areas: the difference ranged from about 10% to almost 40%.

The overall mean booth coverage (all districts combined) was statistically significantly higher in CMC areas compared to non-CMC areas in the multi-variate analysis, as was found in the bi-variate analysis.

The values of a bi-variate analysis of mean booth coverage vs. CMC status, adjusting for clustering by block, is shown at the top of Table 2. On average, booth coverage in CMC areas is 69% vs. 50% for non-CMC areas---a difference of about 19% higher in CMC areas.

Unexpectedly, the relationship between the number of rallies and the difference in booth coverage was negative.

The difference in booth coverage between CMC and non-CMC areas varies greatly by district suggesting a possible interaction: the effect on booth coverage due to CMC status is modified by which district we analyze.

There is evidence that a higher number of rallies is actually detrimental to the objective of increasing booth coverage.

The number of mosque announcements, Bullawa Tollies, and rallies were significant social mobilization determinants of the difference in booth coverage between CMC and Non-CMC areas.

There is evidence that a high number of rallies wereactually detrimental to the objective of increasing booth coverage in the study setting.