Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
meager evidence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "meager evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where the amount of evidence available is insufficient or lacking in quantity or quality. Example: "The investigation was hampered by meager evidence, making it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
14 human-written examples
Apparently, there is meager evidence to support that, too.
News & Media
This is a progression that offers meager evidence either for evolution or for intelligent design.
News & Media
Wolff suggests new sets of biographical connections, convincingly speculates in the face of meager evidence and scrupulously accumulates the details of daily life.
News & Media
But there's a difference between dogged reporting and reporting that pretends even the most meager evidence — loose paraphrases, faded memories, suggestions — is definitive proof.
News & Media
Mr. Eagleton shook the pan a few years ago when he accused Martin Amis, on meager evidence, of being an Islamophobe.
News & Media
Given the meager evidence available, we cannot hope to settle the matter.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
42 human-written examples
While urban design theory offers numerous suggestions for successful streetscapes there is meager empirical evidence of their effects.
Science
However, what he really has in mind here is (far more sensibly) a process of hypothesis, based on meager empirical evidence, but also going well beyond it, and therefore vulnerable to subsequent falsification, and abandonment or revision if falsified.
Science
The meager histological evidence provided is not very compelling, however.
Science
Despite meager scientific evidence, emphasis on availability of natural light in the ICU environment is universal [ 35].
Science
The above inferences were, however, based on meager genetic evidence and very few Austro-Asiatic populations (a maximum of 3) were included in those studies.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "meager evidence", ensure you clearly articulate the implications of the lack of substantial proof and highlight any alternative interpretations or possibilities.
Common error
Avoid making definitive claims or drawing strong conclusions when the available evidence is "meager". Instead, acknowledge the limitations and present your findings as tentative or preliminary.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "meager evidence" functions as a noun phrase, where "meager" modifies the noun "evidence". It describes the quantity or quality of evidence available, often implying it is insufficient. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "meager evidence" is a valid and useful phrase to describe a situation where the available evidence is lacking in quantity or quality. While Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, and its frequency is uncommon, the phrase finds its niche in academic, scientific, and news reporting contexts. When using "meager evidence", it's important to acknowledge the limitations it implies and avoid overstating claims based on such limited support. Alternatives like "scant evidence" or "limited evidence" can provide subtle variations in meaning.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
scant evidence
Replaces "meager" with "scant", implying a minimal amount of evidence.
slim evidence
Uses "slim" to convey the idea that the evidence is thin and unconvincing.
limited evidence
Emphasizes the restricted quantity of evidence available.
insufficient evidence
Highlights that the evidence is not enough to support a claim.
paltry evidence
Suggests the evidence is insignificant and of little value.
weak evidence
Focuses on the poor quality and unpersuasiveness of the evidence.
scarce evidence
Indicates that the evidence is hard to find or obtain.
minimal evidence
Highlights that the amount of evidence is at the lowest possible level.
negligible evidence
Suggests the evidence is so small that it can be ignored.
tenuous evidence
Implies the evidence is fragile and easily refuted.
FAQs
How can I use "meager evidence" in a sentence?
"Meager evidence" is typically used to describe situations where the available proof is insufficient. For example: "The prosecution struggled to build a strong case due to the "meager evidence" available."
What's a good alternative to "meager evidence"?
Alternatives include "scant evidence", "slim evidence", or "limited evidence", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it appropriate to use "meager evidence" in formal writing?
Yes, "meager evidence" is suitable for formal writing. It is a clear and concise way to indicate a lack of substantial proof or support in academic, scientific, or professional contexts.
What does it mean when someone says there is "meager evidence"?
It means the evidence presented is weak, sparse, or unconvincing, suggesting that any conclusions drawn from it should be treated with caution.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested