Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

may have contributed to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "may have contributed to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential factors or influences that could have played a role in a particular outcome or situation. Example: "The recent changes in policy may have contributed to the increase in employee satisfaction."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

which may have contributed to the deaths.

News & Media

The New York Times

The move may have contributed to strong domestic sales.

News & Media

The New York Times

Those deals may have contributed to the Haffas' undoing.

News & Media

The New York Times

This may have contributed to indecision about their political future.

News & Media

The New Yorker

And that may have contributed to its troubles.

This may have contributed to Seldon's tough stance.

News & Media

The Guardian

Ironically, the uncertainty may have contributed to my staying on.

Here Australia may have contributed to their own downfall.

Several factors may have contributed to this result.

Dehydration may have contributed to the development of AAO.

However, other intoxicants may have contributed to this clinical picture.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "may have contributed to", ensure you provide context about the other potential factors involved. This acknowledges the complexity of causation and avoids overstating the influence of a single element.

Common error

Avoid using "may have contributed to" when there's no evidence to support a causal link. Instead, acknowledge uncertainty or explore multiple possibilities without presenting speculation as fact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "may have contributed to" functions as a causal connector, suggesting a possible influence or factor in bringing about a certain outcome. Ludwig provides numerous examples in both scientific and news contexts, illustrating its use in attributing potential causes.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "may have contributed to" serves as a crucial linguistic tool for expressing potential causality or influence without asserting absolute certainty. Ludwig AI affirms its correct usage in written English. Appearing commonly in both scientific and news contexts, it helps to construct reasoned explanations while acknowledging the complexity of causation. While grammatically sound, it's important to avoid overstating causation or presenting speculation as fact. Alternatives like "might have influenced" and "could have led to" offer flexibility in conveying similar ideas with slightly different nuances.

FAQs

What does "may have contributed to" mean?

The phrase "may have contributed to" indicates that something possibly played a part in causing or influencing a particular result, but it's not the only factor and its impact isn't certain.

How can I use "may have contributed to" in a sentence?

You can use "may have contributed to" when you want to suggest a possible cause or influence, such as: "The lack of funding "may have contributed to" the project's delay."

What are some alternatives to "may have contributed to"?

You can use alternatives like "might have influenced", "could have led to", or "may have played a role in" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "may have contributed to" and "definitely caused"?

"May have contributed to" suggests a possible but uncertain influence, whereas "definitely caused" asserts a direct and confirmed cause-and-effect relationship.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: