Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
matter for debate
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "matter for debate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a topic or issue that is open to discussion or differing opinions. Example: "The effectiveness of remote work policies is a matter for debate among industry leaders."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
subject to discussion
open to question
debatable issue
topic for discussion
up for consideration
disputed topic
point of contention
subject of contention
point for discussion
subject for deliberation
talking point
point for examination
topic for consideration
issue for consideration
matters for discussion
item for consideration
question for consideration
argument for discussion
point for point
point for deliberation
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Of course it's a matter for debate.
News & Media
Originalism in the courts is certainly a matter for debate.
News & Media
My womanhood is not a matter for debate.
News & Media
Quite how young remains a matter for debate.
News & Media
How serious these attempts were was a matter for debate.
News & Media
In my view it isn't even a matter for debate.
News & Media
That circumstance is in itself a matter for debate.
News & Media
Quite what provoked all this is a matter for debate.
News & Media
The many methodological and conceptual tools necessary are still matter for debate.
You can decide yourselves whether this is a serious matter for debate.
News & Media
Perhaps not surprisingly, Mr. Christie's personality, too, was matter for debate.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "matter for debate" when introducing a topic with multiple valid perspectives. This signals to the audience that differing opinions are welcome and expected.
Common error
Avoid using "matter for debate" to undermine valid claims. While some topics have nuanced perspectives, established facts should not be presented as mere opinions.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "matter for debate" functions as a noun phrase, often used as a predicate nominative or a subject complement. It identifies a topic or issue as being open to discussion and differing opinions, as seen in Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
News & Media
36%
Science
34%
Encyclopedias
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Wiki
2%
Academia
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "matter for debate" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to indicate that a topic is open to discussion and has multiple perspectives. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it appears frequently in news, science, and encyclopedic sources. When using this phrase, it's best to introduce topics that genuinely have varying valid perspectives, and it should be avoided when stating obvious facts. Related phrases include "subject to discussion" and "debatable issue". The frequency of "matter for debate" across authoritative sources underscores its reliability and appropriateness in diverse writing contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
debatable issue
Directly states that the issue is suitable for debate, emphasizing the existence of opposing viewpoints.
subject to discussion
Emphasizes the act of discussing the topic, highlighting its openness to different perspectives.
topic for discussion
A general term for a subject that can be discussed. It's neutral and doesn't necessarily imply disagreement.
open to question
Implies uncertainty or doubt, suggesting that the topic's validity is not fully established.
up for consideration
Suggests that the topic is being evaluated or weighed, often in a decision-making process.
disputed topic
Indicates that the topic is contested or challenged, suggesting that its validity or interpretation is in question.
contested issue
Similar to 'disputed topic', highlighting the fact that the issue is being actively challenged or opposed.
point of contention
Highlights the disagreement or conflict surrounding the topic, emphasizing opposing viewpoints.
arguable point
Focuses on the possibility of arguing different sides of the issue, suggesting that reasonable arguments exist for multiple positions.
area of controversy
Emphasizes the contentious nature of the topic, suggesting widespread disagreement or public debate.
FAQs
How can I use "matter for debate" in a sentence?
You can use "matter for debate" to introduce a topic that is open to different interpretations or opinions. For example, "Whether or not that was a smart move is a "matter for debate"."
What's the difference between "matter for debate" and "debatable issue"?
"Matter for debate" is a more general phrase indicating that a topic is open to discussion. "Debatable issue" specifically emphasizes that there are arguments for different sides of the issue.
What can I say instead of "matter for debate"?
You can use alternatives like "subject to discussion", "open to question", or "arguable point" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it appropriate to use "matter for debate" in formal writing?
Yes, "matter for debate" is suitable for formal writing. It's frequently used in news articles, academic papers, and business reports to introduce topics with varying perspectives.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested