massive infringement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "massive infringement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant violation or breach of rights, laws, or regulations. Example: "The company faced severe penalties due to the massive infringement of copyright laws."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

"The issue is are you creating and profiting from, and maintaining a system that is used for massive infringement," he said.

The New York Times

The "Purple Rain" singer filed a copyright lawsuit on 16 January in the Northern District of California, targeting 22 individuals he believes have committed "massive infringement and bootlegging" of his copyright.

Independent

Its flagrant copying and massive infringement must stop".

BBC

The action, filed earlier this month, reads: "The defendants in this case engage in massive infringement and bootlegging of Prince's material.

BBC

A website called StopNewsom.com, funded by the Firearms Policy Coalition, particularly took issue with the measure's restrictions on ammunition purchases, calling the proposed rules "burdensome" and a "massive infringement on your Constitutional rights". .

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Moreover, they struck what looks like the best available balance under current laws between the claims of media firms, which are battling massive infringements of their copyrights, and tech firms, which are keen to keep the doors to innovation wide open (see article).This case is only the latest episode in a long-running battle between media and technology companies.

The Economist

The bikies legislation, whether we consider its absurdities – such as the now discarded pink jumpsuits for prisoners – or its massive infringements on the rights of free association and free speech, is redolent of a distaste for the rule of law and for personal and communal liberties.

The Guardian - Opinion

The amorphous concept of "terror" also helped justify massive infringements on our civil liberties.

Huffington Post

"Massive IP infringement by U.S. companies.

The New York Times

In 2005, the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers sued for "massive copyright infringement".

The Guardian - Tech

In the suit, Viacom accuses the video-sharing Web site YouTube, which Google owns, of "massive copyright infringement".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing copyright violations, consider using "massive infringement" to emphasize the scale and impact of the illegal activity.

Common error

Avoid using "massive infringement" in casual conversation or informal writing. It is better suited for formal reports, legal documents, and news articles where the gravity of the violation needs to be highlighted.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "massive infringement" functions as a noun phrase, where "massive" is an adjective modifying the noun "infringement". As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "massive infringement" is a grammatically sound noun phrase used to describe a large-scale violation, typically in the context of copyright, patent, or other legal rights. Ludwig AI indicates that the expression is correct and usable in English. While the phrase is relatively infrequent, it is primarily found in news media, serving to emphasize the significance of the violation. When using "massive infringement", consider its formal tone and ensure its suitability for the context. Alternatives like "widespread violation" or "extensive breach" can be employed depending on the desired emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

widespread violation

Replaces "massive" with "widespread", emphasizing the extensive scope of the violation.

extensive breach

Uses "extensive breach" to convey a significant violation or break of a rule or law.

large-scale violation

Employs "large-scale" instead of "massive" to describe the extent of the infringement.

major infraction

Substitutes "massive infringement" with "major infraction", focusing on a serious violation.

substantial transgression

Replaces the original phrase with more formal and emphatic wording, indicating a significant violation.

gross violation

Uses "gross violation" to emphasize the severity and unacceptability of the infringement.

wholesale breach

Emphasizes the comprehensive nature of the violation, suggesting it affects many aspects.

systematic infringement

Highlights the organized or methodical nature of the infringement.

rampant violation

Indicates that the violation is widespread and unchecked.

egregious infringement

Focuses on the shocking and outrageous nature of the infringement.

FAQs

How can I use "massive infringement" in a sentence?

You can use "massive infringement" to describe significant breaches of copyright, patent, or other legal rights. For example: "The company faced severe penalties for "massive infringement" of copyright laws."

What are some alternatives to "massive infringement"?

Alternatives include "widespread violation", "extensive breach", or "large-scale violation", depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "massive infringement" in academic writing?

Yes, "massive infringement" is appropriate in academic writing when discussing legal or ethical violations, particularly in fields like law, economics, or intellectual property.

What is the difference between "massive infringement" and "minor infringement"?

"Massive infringement" refers to a large-scale or significant violation, whereas "minor infringement" indicates a smaller, less consequential breach. The scale of the violation is the key difference.