Sentence examples for markedly lower sensitivity from inspiring English sources

In line with the above-mentioned results, neurons from stressed rats showed a markedly lower sensitivity to the changes in the external Ca2+ concentration than neurons from control rats, suggesting that the release probability of stressed neurons already reached saturation at physiological Ca2+ concentrations.

Radiography had markedly lower sensitivity for bone erosions than CT, MRI and US.

The threshold of ≥11 already showed a markedly lower sensitivity (69%), but better specificity (82%).

Scenarios where we consider an exact match on names or a JW score above 0.7 have a markedly lower sensitivity and PPV.

In comparison to CRB-65 and CURB-65 (sensitivity about 95%and85%5%, respectively), CURSI had a markedly lower sensitivity (around 42%).

A prior modeling study by Hernjak et al. explores the significance of experimental observations in normal cerebellar Purkinje neurons, which show markedly lower sensitivity and higher abundance of IP3R1 relative to other cell types [ 33- 35].

Explosives with a small particle size, narrow size distribution, and rounded morphology exhibit markedly lowered initiation sensitivity and reduced critical diameter.

Running the TEannot pipeline with the consensus sequences generated by RepeatModeler resulted in a sensitivity markedly lower than that for the annotations obtained with the de novo library from the TEdenovo pipeline, although specificity was slightly higher (Table S12).

The assay demonstrated markedly lower background and significantly higher sensitivity compared to the initially contrived assay that used commercial antibodies.

The specificity of cytology in the same CS group was marginally less than that of MCM-2 ICC, at 72.2% (95% CI (62.8, 80.4)), although sensitivity of cytology was markedly lower, at 40%9595% CI (5.3, 85.3)) (Table 1).

Compared with high-resolution electric source imaging (using individual MRI) the structural MRI alone provided slightly lower sensitivity (76.3% versus 84.1%) and markedly lower specificity (52.9% versus 87.5%), followed by PET (sensitivity 68.7%, specificity 43.8%) and ictal SPECT (sensitivity 57.7%, specificity 46.7%; Table 5 and Fig. 5).