Sentence examples for markedly lower success from inspiring English sources

Looking upon the success data, both deciduous teeth and autotransplants have markedly lower success than survival, which is mainly due to the high rate of ankyloses and root resorption in both treatment options using the natural teeth (Fig. 2).

Compared with these highly qualified EMS systems, markedly lower success rates are observed in other systems.

Compared with these highly qualified EMS systems, markedly lower success rates are observed in other EMS systems, with only 9% to 12% of patients being admitted to hospital and only 1% to 3% being discharged from hospital with good neurological outcomes [ 1, 8, 9, 28- 30].

Markedly lower reproductive success of non-native, naturally spawning hatchery steelhead trout compared with native, wild fish, however, has been documented in several areas (a decrease of at least two-thirds the number of smolts produced per individual, Kostow et al. 2003; McLean et al. 2004; reviewed in Araki et al. 2008).

Despite differences in the initial numbers of copepodids used per family (see Table  2), the frequency of surviving individuals was consistent among groups and families, with two exceptions that displayed markedly lower infection success: the 'Sensitive' Family 10 (29%), and Family 13 (19%) from the 'Unknown' group.

For 105 candidates a distinct band at around the expected 50 kDa was observed (Supplementary Figure 1), with eukaryotic genes showing markedly lower expression success rates (only 3/16 expressed in soluble form) likely due to the lack of adequate post-translational modification systems or to the formation of inclusion bodies in the bacterial host.

In contrast to small-molecule inhibitors with few rotational bonds, conventional docking and scoring of protein-based inhibitors and their receptors have markedly lower rates of success [32].

However, non HDL cholesterol treatment success in the NEPTUNE II survey was markedly lower than that for LDL cholesterol overall and across risk categories.

But the data demonstrate that our delinquency and loss rates are markedly lower than industry norms.

The cost is markedly lower than an active fund at just 0.4% per annum".

At the same time, they have markedly lower G.P.A.s and S.A.T. scores than their peers.