marked with

USAGE SUMMARY

"marked with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe something that has a visible identifier or attribute. For example, "The building was marked with a large sign indicating its purpose."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The trail was marked with rusty signs.

The New York Times

Curves marked with 30 m.p.h.

The New York Times

Real chests are marked with X's.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

marked with a flag value = 1.

Columbia University

The ULX is marked with a circle.

Harvard University

These folders are marked with [name redacted].

Harvard University

My back is marked with ripening bruises.

The Guardian

The graves are marked with piled stones.

The New York Times

Both occasions are marked with music.

The Guardian - Music

Jefferson's originals are marked with green ribbons.

The New York Times - Arts

Areas marked with * are expanded below.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "marked with", ensure that the identifying feature is clearly stated. For example, instead of "The map was marked", specify "The map was marked with a red X."

Common error

Avoid using "marked with" without specifying what the mark is. Saying something is "marked with importance" is less effective than saying it's "marked with a significant increase in sales."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "marked with" functions as a verb phrase. It typically connects a subject with a descriptive element, indicating that the subject possesses a specific identifying mark or characteristic. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "marked with" is a versatile verb phrase used to describe something bearing a distinct identifying feature. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. It is frequently used in news, scientific, and academic contexts to provide precise descriptions. While the phrase can often be replaced with alternatives like "characterized by" or "distinguished by", "marked with" specifically emphasizes the presence of a visible or noticeable mark. To use it effectively, ensure that you clearly specify what the mark is. Avoid vague identifications; be precise for clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

characterized by

Focuses on distinctive attributes or qualities that define something.

distinguished by

Highlights a unique feature that sets something apart from others.

designated with

Emphasizes the use of a specific symbol or notation to identify something.

identified by

Focuses on recognizing something through a specific trait or feature.

labeled with

Highlights the act of affixing a tag or marker to something.

noted for

Emphasizes a particular attribute that is well-known or significant.

signified by

Highlights the representation of something through a symbol or sign.

tagged with

Indicates the use of a tag or label for identification purposes.

bearing the mark of

Emphasizes the presence of a distinctive physical or symbolic feature.

having the imprint of

Implies a lasting effect or characteristic left behind.

FAQs

How can I use "marked with" in a sentence?

Use "marked with" to indicate something has a visible identifier or attribute. For example, "The trail was marked with rusty signs."

What can I say instead of "marked with"?

You can use alternatives like "characterized by", "distinguished by", or "identified by" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "marked by" instead of "marked with"?

Yes, "marked by" can often be used interchangeably, but it often implies a more abstract or impactful characteristic. For example, "His career was marked by success" uses "marked by" to denote a defining quality.

What's the difference between "marked with" and "labeled with"?

"Marked with" generally refers to any kind of indication, while "labeled with" specifically implies attaching a label or tag.