Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
many contributors
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "many contributors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a large number of people who have contributed to a project, work, or discussion. Example: "The success of the project was due to the efforts of many contributors who shared their expertise and resources."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Many contributors to the Edge symposium hit on this point.
News & Media
There were probably many contributors, and it was pointless to squabble.
News & Media
By the 35th, many contributors feel free to let it rip.
News & Media
Of the many contributors to energy imbalance today, plentiful sugar may be the worst.
News & Media
The journal's founders, William Phillips and Philip Rahv, were Jewish, as were many contributors.
News & Media
"We have many, many contributors who are far from wealthy," his spokesman, John Del Cecato, said.
News & Media
Any successful political effort will have many contributors who deserve some credit.
News & Media
Many contributors said that the rental market remained much stronger than the sales market.
News & Media
So far, the many contributors to Firefox seem pleased with its financial success.
News & Media
Many contributors testified to the example he set and to his courage and encouragement.
News & Media
For many contributors, it is a tradition of charitable giving that spans generations.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "many contributors" when you want to emphasize the collective effort behind something. It's particularly effective when highlighting the collaborative aspect of a project or achievement.
Common error
Avoid using "many contributors" without providing some context or detail about their contributions. Vague references can diminish the impact of acknowledging their collective effort. Instead of just saying "the project had many contributors", specify their roles or types of contributions.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "many contributors" functions as a quantifier followed by a noun. It is used to specify that a large number of individuals or entities have contributed to something, as shown in Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
News & Media
42%
Science
29%
Academia
12%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
3%
Wiki
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "many contributors" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote a significant number of people involved in a project or activity. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage across various domains like news, science, and academia. While versatile, it's best practice to provide context regarding the nature of their contributions to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "numerous participants" or "several authors" can offer nuanced variations. As Ludwig's analysis shows, this expression effectively acknowledges collaborative efforts and is suitable for both formal and informal communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a significant number of contributors
Adds emphasis on the importance of quantity of contributors.
substantial number of people contributing
Emphasizes the considerable amount of people actively contributing.
numerous participants
Replaces "contributors" with "participants", focusing on involvement rather than contribution.
several authors
Specifies the type of contributors as "authors", implying written contributions.
diverse range of participants
Highlights the variety within the group, using "participants" instead of "contributors".
various individuals involved
More explicitly states the involvement of "individuals", emphasizing variety.
a multitude of people involved
Changes the phrase to be more evocative and descriptive of a large group of people involved.
various parties participating
Focuses on the participative aspect, using "parties" to denote different groups or entities.
a host of people
Uses a more figurative expression to indicate a large number of people.
multiple stakeholders
Emphasizes the vested interest of the contributors, framing them as "stakeholders".
FAQs
How can I use "many contributors" in a sentence?
You can use "many contributors" to highlight the collaborative effort behind a project. For example, "The success of this open-source software is due to the efforts of "many contributors" from around the world."
What are some alternatives to "many contributors"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "numerous participants", "several authors", or "a multitude of people involved" to convey a similar meaning as "many contributors".
Is it better to say "a lot of contributors" or "many contributors"?
"Many contributors" is generally considered more formal and professional than "a lot of contributors". While both are acceptable, "many contributors" is often preferred in academic and business writing.
What does it imply when a project has "many contributors"?
It typically suggests that the project is a collaborative effort, potentially indicating a diverse range of skills and perspectives. It can also imply that the project is well-supported and actively maintained.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested