Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Briefly, from the F1 progeny, 50 females and 6 males were retained to produce the F2 generation.
Data from the remaining forty-six subjects (20 males) were retained for analysis; the ages of these participants ranged from 18 32 years (mean ± SD, 23.3±3.5 years).
257 adults (145 males) were retained.
In rounds two and three of the mating trials, previously successful males that failed to mate, and previously unsuccessful males that obtained a mating, were discarded such that only repeatedly successful (stud) or repeatedly unsuccessful (dud) males were retained.
Therefore, in subsequent models separate sex effects for the female threshold deviation from the threshold for males were retained for the different age groups.> The unique environmental simplex model with innovation and transmission terms fitted the data well (model 3a: χ (9) = 7.78, p = 0.557).
Similar(55)
120 images were retained for use.
A total of 330 raccoon samples (192 males and 138 females) and 345 striped skunk samples (195 males and 150 females) were retained for this study.
Those sequences from three-gene operons (malE, malF and malG) were retained and the cognate genes were concatenated.
On day 2 post-partum, all female offspring (5 8) and enough males to yield 10 offspring/litter were retained.
Four pups per litter were retained, one male and one female for auditory testing for the present results, and one male and one female for cognitive testing (data reported elsewhere), and euthanized the remaining pups.
Invasive male breast cancers (575 cases) were retained.
Related(20)
males were maintained
adults were retained
women were retained
students were retained
men were retained
males were preserved
years were retained
gender were retained
males were aroused
males were diagnosed
males were tested
males were castrated
males were permitted
males were viewed
males were removed
males were collected
males were killed
males were housed
males were excused
males were transgender
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com