major implications

USAGE SUMMARY

"major implications" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the serious effects or consequences that a certain event or action may have. For example: "The decision to cancel the event had major implications for the organization, as it jeopardized their reputation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

This has two major implications.

The New York Times

And this has major implications.

The Guardian - Tech

This has, I think, two major implications.

The Guardian

This discord has two major implications.

The Guardian

The split has major implications for staff and service users.

The Guardian

And the finding has major implications for conservation biology.

The New York Times - Science

That has major implications for aspirants for higher office.

The New York Times

Those trends have major implications for American politics.

The Guardian - Opinion

Yet that shift is happening — and it has major implications.

The New York Times

It also has major implications for his re-election bid.

The New York Times

But events in Ukraine have major implications for Georgia too.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "major implications", ensure the context clearly defines what those implications are. Avoid vague statements; be specific about the potential consequences or effects.

Common error

Avoid using "major implications" when the effects are minor or insignificant. Overusing this phrase can dilute its impact and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "major implications" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as the object of a verb (e.g., "has", "have"). It highlights the importance of the consequences resulting from a particular action or event. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use in various contexts, emphasizing the significance of the impacts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "major implications" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe significant consequences or effects. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across diverse contexts, particularly in news, science, and business. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity about the specific implications and avoid overstating their significance. Alternatives like "significant consequences" or "substantial ramifications" can offer nuanced variations. This phrase is best used to highlight important and potentially transformative outcomes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant consequences

Focuses on the importance of the results.

substantial ramifications

Emphasizes the widespread impact of the consequences.

considerable repercussions

Highlights the far-reaching negative effects.

serious consequences

Focuses on the gravity and importance of the effects.

profound effects

Highlights the depth and intensity of the effects.

far-reaching impact

Emphasizes the extensiveness of the influence.

notable outcomes

Stresses the visibility and importance of the results.

key consequences

Highlights the importance and centrality of the effects.

critical implications

Emphasizes the decisiveness and urgency of the effects.

vital consequences

Stresses the essential and indispensable nature of the results.

FAQs

How can I use "major implications" in a sentence?

You can use "major implications" to highlight the significant consequences or effects of an event, decision, or situation. For example, "The study's findings have "major implications" for public health policy".

What are some alternatives to "major implications"?

Alternatives include "significant consequences", "substantial ramifications", or "serious consequences", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "major implications"?

It's appropriate when discussing situations where the outcomes or effects are far-reaching, important, and potentially transformative. Ensure that the context supports the use of such a strong phrase.

What's the difference between "major implications" and "minor implications"?

"Major implications" refers to significant, far-reaching effects, while "minor implications" indicates that the effects are small, localized, or of limited importance.