major contributor

USAGE SUMMARY

"major contributor" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a person or an entity that has had a significant positive influence on a project, event, or situation. For example, "John Smith was a major contributor to the success of the charity event."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I'm a major contributor to "Fodor's Greece".

The New York Times

However, the major contributor to wettability alteration is still uncertain.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

The company is a major contributor to philanthropic efforts there.

The New York Times

Yes, those pesky turbulent markets are a major contributor.

The Guardian - Business

Currency competition was another major contributor to the disaster.

The Guardian - Books

The developer was a major contributor to Mr. Gore's campaign.

The New York Times

Capacitor mismatch is a major contributor for such an error.

Microelectronics Journal

Population growth is a major contributor to environmental damage.

The Economist

Obesity is a major contributor to ill health throughout life.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Crome became its president and a major contributor.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Mr. Rapoport was a major contributor to Democratic campaigns.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "major contributor", ensure the context clearly indicates what the person or entity contributed to, making the statement more impactful and informative.

Common error

Avoid using "major contributor" when the actual contribution is minor or insignificant. Overstating importance can weaken your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "major contributor" functions as a noun phrase often acting as a subject complement or appositive, identifying an entity that provides significant input or influence. Ludwig confirms that this expression is grammatically correct and broadly applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

28%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Academia

11%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "major contributor" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase to denote an entity or individual who has significantly impacted a situation or project. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's appropriate for diverse contexts, ranging from formal business settings and scientific publications to news and media. It's crucial to use this phrase accurately, ensuring the contribution is genuinely substantial to maintain credibility. While alternatives like "significant influence" or "key player" exist, "major contributor" offers a direct and professional way to acknowledge considerable impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant influence

Focuses on the impact rather than the contribution itself.

key player

Emphasizes the importance of the individual or entity.

primary factor

Highlights the importance of a particular element.

chief architect

Suggests a leading role in creation or development.

leading light

Implies inspiration and guidance to others.

principal cause

Focuses on the primary reason for something happening.

driving force

Highlights the energy and motivation behind something.

instrumental figure

Stresses the importance of a person's actions.

vital component

Emphasizes the necessity of a particular part.

essential element

Highlights the fundamental importance of an item or idea.

FAQs

How can I use "major contributor" in a sentence?

You can use "major contributor" to describe someone or something that significantly influences a particular outcome. For example, "She was a "major contributor" to the project's success."

What are some alternatives to "major contributor"?

Alternatives include "significant influence", "key player", or "primary factor", depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "major contributor" in formal writing?

Yes, "major contributor" is suitable for formal writing. It's a neutral and professional way to acknowledge significant contributions. Other phrases may also be suited depending on the writing objective.

What's the difference between "major contributor" and "minor contributor"?

"Major contributor" indicates a significant impact, while "minor contributor" suggests a smaller or less noticeable influence. The choice depends on the actual level of contribution.