maize sequences had

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "maize sequences had" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used in scientific or academic contexts when discussing genetic or biological data related to maize. Example: "In our study, we found that maize sequences had significant variations in their genetic markers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

A tree constructed from Arabidopsis, rice, and maize sequences had indicated that Group B is " Arabidopsis only" [ 90].

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The tree we obtained showed that the maize BX2-5 sequences had orthologs distributed in four branches, boxed in Figure 2 as BX2 -Bx5 clades.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Only Tgm4 and Tgm5 sequences had a 1 kb segment with 39% similarity to the ORF1 of maize Spm/En transposable element tnpD gene.

BMC Plant Biology

The first assembly of maize genome sequence has recently been published [ 33], however, to the best of our knowledge, the maize ARF gene family (ZmARF genes) has not been characterized in detail.

BMC Genomics

The use of rice, sorghum, maize, and Brachypodium genome sequences have been extremely useful for synteny based applications and identification of shared genes and traits [ 31].

BMC Genomics

The dicot and moncot intron sequences have diverged completely and the maize introns are generally larger - from start to stop codons the maize LKR/SDH gene spans 9515 bp while the Arabidopsis gene spans 5590 bp.

BMC Plant Biology

ESTs of helitron sequences have been detected in certain maize tissues [ 15].

BMC Genomics

CNS (within introns or upstream regulatory sequences), have been recently surveyed in cereals (maize vs rice) and mammals (human vs mouse) [ 45, 46].

BMC Genomics

It is highly implausible that these newly created sequences have not played a role in the evolution of maize genes and of maize.

Genetics

A complete, annotated maize genome sequence is not yet available, but a large number of sequences have been collected in the GSS (Genome Survey Sequence) database, which contains gene-enriched maize DNA sequences derived by methylation filtration [ 13, 26], High-Cot enrichment and other methods that reduce repetitive sequences [ 44].

BMC Genomics

The maize genome sequence has been completed, and filtered protein and cds sequences have also become available [ 21].

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "maize sequences had", ensure that the context clearly indicates what attribute or characteristic the sequences possessed. Providing specific details enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "maize sequences have" when referring to past findings or characteristics that were identified in a specific study or time frame. Maintain consistency by using the past tense "had" to reflect the completed nature of the observation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "maize sequences had" typically functions as part of a clause within scientific or academic writing. It introduces a description of attributes, characteristics, or components that were present or identified in maize sequences. Based on Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "maize sequences had" is grammatically correct and primarily used in scientific contexts to describe characteristics or attributes identified in maize sequences. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. While examples are rare, the phrase is authoritative within the scientific domain. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what attributes the sequences possessed and maintain tense consistency to accurately reflect completed observations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

maize sequences possessed

Replaces "had" with "possessed", indicating ownership or attribute.

maize sequences exhibited

Substitutes "had" with "exhibited", emphasizing a display or manifestation of a characteristic.

maize sequences showed

Replaces "had" with "showed", highlighting a demonstrated quality or feature.

maize sequences revealed

Substitutes "had" with "revealed", emphasizing the discovery of information from the sequences.

maize sequences contained

Replaces "had" with "contained", focusing on the presence of specific elements within the sequences.

maize sequences presented

Substitutes "had" with "presented", highlighting a formal display of characteristics by the sequences.

maize sequences displayed

Replaces "had" with "displayed", emphasizing a visible exhibition of qualities.

maize sequences demonstrated

Substitutes "had" with "demonstrated", highlighting proven or clear qualities.

maize sequences were found to have

Adds introductory phrase "were found to have" increasing formality and emphasis on the discovery of the sequences' qualities.

maize sequences were identified with

Emphasizes the sequences identification with specific characteristics by using "were identified with".

FAQs

How can I use "maize sequences had" in a sentence?

You can use "maize sequences had" to describe characteristics or properties that were found in maize sequences in a past study, such as "The "maize sequences had" a high level of genetic diversity".

What can I say instead of "maize sequences had"?

You can use alternatives like "maize sequences possessed", "maize sequences exhibited", or "maize sequences showed" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "maize sequences have" instead of "maize sequences had"?

The choice between "maize sequences have" and ""maize sequences had"" depends on the context. Use "had" when referring to past findings or a specific study. Use "have" if referring to current, ongoing characteristics.

What is the difference between saying "maize sequences had" and "maize sequences were shown to have"?

"Maize sequences had" is a direct statement about a characteristic, while "maize sequences were shown to have" emphasizes that the characteristic was demonstrated or proven through some form of analysis or research. The latter adds a level of formality and emphasizes the evidence.