maintained for

USAGE SUMMARY

"maintained for" is a valid and commonly used phrase in written English.
For example, you could say: "The records were carefully maintained for a period of several years."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The improvement was maintained for six months.

The Guardian - Opinion

These conditions were maintained for several days.

Nuclear Engineering and Design

Orientation was maintained for each ACL.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

These prices will be maintained for some time.

The Guardian

A balance that Iraq's ruthless dictator had maintained for years.

The Guardian - Opinion

Projection will be maintained for two weeks, and then abandoned.

The Guardian - Arts

Each temperature step is maintained for 30 min.

Nature

A single tempo and metre are maintained for each section.

Britannica

Separate subaccounts shall be maintained for each of the above.

Cornell University

(3) which related to plans maintained for benefit of employees.

Cornell University

Eartag records must be maintained for 5 years.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing experimental conditions or treatments, use "maintained for" to clearly indicate the duration of a specific state or action. This provides clarity and reproducibility in scientific writing.

Common error

Don't use imprecise language when specifying duration. Instead of saying "The temperature was maintained for some time", provide a specific duration, such as "The temperature was maintained for 30 minutes" to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "maintained for" functions as a verb phrase with a preposition, indicating the duration over which a specific condition, state, or action is preserved or kept constant. Ludwig's examples show its use in contexts like temperature control, treatment durations, and record keeping.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

19%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "maintained for" is a versatile and commonly used expression that functions to specify the duration for which a condition, process, or activity is kept constant. It is grammatically correct and appears most frequently in scientific, academic, and news contexts. Ludwig's analysis reveals its usage across various domains, highlighting its utility in providing precise temporal information. When writing, ensure to avoid vague timeframes and specify clear durations to enhance clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

continued for

Offers a more direct and less formal way to state that something was ongoing for a period.

kept up for

Emphasizes the effort to continue something, adding a nuance of active preservation that "maintained for" might lack.

sustained for

Highlights the ability to keep something going, focusing on the endurance aspect more than the simple duration.

preserved for

Implies a focus on preventing degradation or change, which is a specific type of maintenance.

held for

Suggests a more forceful or deliberate act of keeping something in a specific state or condition.

retained for

Focuses on keeping possession or control of something, adding a sense of ownership or authority.

prolonged for

Emphasizes extending the duration, adding a sense of making something last longer than expected.

upheld for

Implies maintaining a standard or principle, not just a state or condition.

executed for

Focuses on the performance of a task during a period, adding an element of active work.

administrated for

Highlights the management aspect during a specific period, useful in contexts related to governance or care.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "maintained for" to sound more formal?

In more formal contexts, consider using alternatives such as "sustained for", "preserved for", or "retained for". The choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

What is the difference between "maintained for" and "continued for"?

"Maintained for" suggests an active effort to keep something in a specific condition, while "continued for" simply indicates that something was ongoing without necessarily implying any specific action to preserve it.

Is it correct to use "maintained for" when describing a process?

Yes, "maintained for" is perfectly correct when describing a process or condition that was actively kept in a specific state for a certain period. For example, "The pressure was maintained for 2 hours".

What are some common contexts where "maintained for" is used?

"Maintained for" is frequently used in scientific research, medical studies, and technical documentation to describe how long conditions or treatments were kept consistent. It is also common in business and legal contexts when referring to agreements or standards upheld over time.