main text for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "main text for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the primary content or body of a document, article, or piece of writing that serves a specific purpose or audience. Example: "The main text for the report outlines the findings of our research and provides recommendations for future studies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Refer to the main text for details.

Nature

See main text for details of the expression patterns.

Nature

See main text for details on the weighting procedure.

Nature

"Main text for the US Military History Course.

Stanford University

The aim is to read and discuss the whole book, which will be the main text for the seminar.

University of California, Berkeley

The main text for CS1110 is Think Python: How to Think Like a Computer Scientist, by Allen B. Downey.

Cornell University

The book can be the main text for a intermediate course in water economics or even natural resources.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

On returning to his native city, he wrote the Kitāb at-tawḥīd ("Book of Unity"), which is the main text for Wahhābī doctrines.

Britannica

See the main text for details.

Nanoscale Research Letters

See main text for the exact input format and details.

Journal of Cheminformatics

See the main text for explanation of labels (a, b).

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "main text for", ensure the context clearly indicates what the text is the primary source for, avoiding ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "main text for" when referring to supplementary materials; reserve it for the core, central document or resource.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "main text for" functions as a noun phrase modifier, specifying the primary or central resource associated with a particular subject, course, or study. Ludwig examples show its common usage in academic and scientific writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

66%

Academia

24%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

News & Media

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "main text for" is a common and grammatically sound way to identify the primary resource for a particular subject or course of study. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. Alternatives such as "core text for" or "primary text for" can be used to add nuance. When using "main text for", clarity is key: ensure that the context makes it clear what the text is the primary source for. Ludwig's examples further illustrate the varied applications of this phrase across different domains, reinforcing its versatility and reliability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

core text for

Emphasizes the essential nature of the text, similar to "main text", but with a focus on fundamental content.

primary text for

Highlights the text's role as the most important or first-considered source.

principal text for

Indicates the text is of utmost importance and serves as the leading reference.

fundamental text for

Suggests the text lays the groundwork or is foundational to understanding a subject.

basic text for

Implies the text provides an introduction to or the simplest explanation of a topic.

essential reading for

Highlights the text's importance as necessary material to read and understand.

required reading for

Indicates the text is mandatory or expected for a particular purpose or course.

source material for

Indicates the text is the origin or basis for information or a study.

key resource for

Highlights the text's role as a significant and helpful source of information.

reference text for

Suggests the text serves as a standard or authoritative source of information.

FAQs

How do I use "main text for" in a sentence?

Use "main text for" to indicate the core resource for a specific purpose. For instance, "This book is the "main text for" the course."

What are some alternatives to "main text for"?

Alternatives include "primary text for", "core text for", or "principal text for", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "main text for" in formal writing?

Yes, "main text for" is suitable for formal writing, especially in academic and professional contexts where clarity and precision are essential.

How does "main text for" differ from "recommended reading for"?

"Main text for" signifies a required or central resource, whereas "recommended reading for" suggests supplemental or suggested materials that are not strictly mandatory.