Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
main contributors are
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "main contributors are" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when identifying or discussing the primary individuals or entities that play a significant role in a particular context, such as a project, research, or event. Example: "In our study, the main contributors are researchers from various universities who collaborated on the project."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
10 human-written examples
Its main contributors are Lucio Maia and Jorge du Peixe of the band Naçao Zumbi, working in various spinoff groupings.
News & Media
There's also the issue of sea level rise, whose main contributors are melting glaciers and ice sheets, and thermal expansion (water expanding as it warms).
News & Media
At JPMorgan and Citigroup, disclosures are too generalized to clearly see what the three main contributors are to sales and trading revenue.
News & Media
Their main contributors are business interests and plaintiffs' lawyers, and their agenda is most often the election of judges who could help -- or the defeat of judges who could hinder -- efforts to impose limits on lawsuits seeking damages for injuries.
News & Media
Then the impacts of nuclear data uncertainties on the k-inf are assessed and the main contributors are highlighted.
Science
For wireless backhaul cost, the main contributors are cell site router, power connection cost per site, radio frequency (RF) engineering and annual maintenance and management costs per link.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
50 human-written examples
The main contributors were Farrell, Bator, Koopmans, and Rothenberg.
Wiki
For donor insemination (IUI-D), 26 088 cycles were reported (+1749), the main contributors being Denmark, Spain and France.
Science
The main contributors were the tower (27 39%) and the nacelle production (12 37%).
The final manuscript main contributors were X.S., R.E., J.M., E.M. and G.P. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Science
> -wrap-foot> For non-donor insemination (IUI-H), 142 609 cycles were reported (+8348), the main contributors being France, Italy and Spain.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "main contributors are", ensure you clearly define the context to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify whether you are referring to financial contributions, intellectual input, or physical labor.
Common error
Avoid using "main contributors are" without providing specific examples or details. Simply stating the phrase without backing it up weakens your argument and leaves the audience wanting more information.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "main contributors are" functions as a declarative statement identifying the primary entities or factors responsible for a specific outcome, event, or situation. As shown by Ludwig, it is commonly used in academic and news contexts to highlight key players.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
40%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "main contributors are" is a grammatically correct and functional expression used to highlight the primary actors or factors in a particular context. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usage across diverse fields such as science, news, and formal business. While not exceedingly common, the phrase effectively conveys the importance of specific entities, making it a useful tool for clear and focused communication. To maximize impact, it's important to provide specific examples when using this phrase to avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives such as "key contributors" or "primary contributors" to fine-tune the intended nuance.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
key contributors are
Replaces "main" with "key", indicating significant but not necessarily primary importance.
primary contributors are
Substitutes "main" with "primary", emphasizing the foremost contributors.
leading contributors are
Uses "leading" instead of "main", highlighting those who are at the forefront.
principal contributors are
Replaces "main" with "principal", indicating the most important or chief contributors.
major contributors include
Changes the structure to use "include" and substitutes "main" with "major", denoting significant contributors within a larger group.
significant contributors are
Emphasizes the importance of the contributors, using "significant" in place of "main".
chief contributors are
Uses "chief" to indicate the top or head contributors.
foremost contributors are
Replaces "main" with "foremost", highlighting those who are most prominent or respected.
central figures include
Shifts the focus to "figures" and uses "include", indicating key individuals.
top players are
Uses "top players" to refer to the most influential contributors, framing them as key individuals.
FAQs
How can I use "main contributors are" in a sentence?
You can use "main contributors are" to identify the key entities or individuals responsible for a particular outcome or event. For example, "The "main contributors are" businesses and plaintiffs' lawyers".
What are some alternatives to "main contributors are"?
Some alternatives to "main contributors are" include "key contributors are", "primary contributors are", or "leading contributors are", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it grammatically correct to say "main contributor is"?
Yes, "main contributor is" is grammatically correct when referring to a single contributor, while ""main contributors are"" is used when referring to multiple contributors. The verb form must agree with the number of contributors.
What's the difference between "main contributors are" and "major contributors are"?
"Main contributors are" suggests those with the most significant impact, while "major contributors are" implies substantial but not necessarily the most significant contributions. The choice depends on the specific context and the degree of contribution you wish to emphasize.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested