Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Comparisons were made between subgroups with different BRCA1/2 status, to a series of normal fallopian tube samples, as well to a previously reported series of normal tissue samples and tumors of mesenchymal origin.
* = Comparisons made between subgroups of patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).
Comparisons were made between subgroups of diabetes types (type 1 and type 2 diabetes) to determine whether characteristics differed.
Our analysis does have some limitations in so far as it was post hoc and no direct statistical comparisons could be made between subgroups.
Comparisons of performance were made between subgroups of children and adults, and between males and females (with 0.01 significance level), using Behrens-Fisher statistical test 3 32 (for which no assumptions of equal variances were made).
While no statistical comparisons were made between subgroups, it was apparent that both FEV1 and0–3 and trough FEV1 responses for the individual treatments were, in general, greater in patients with less severe disease.
Similar(53)
Therefore, post hoc comparisons were made between two subgroups of HSM: an FTND-high group and an FTND-low group.
Comparisons of OPSAT-Q scores were also made between selected subgroups of participants: daily (n = 20) versus weekly (n = 83) administration; osteoporosis (n = 75) versus osteopenia (n = 28); and history of fracture (n = 26) versus no fracture history (n = 77).
The use of primary cells from multiple patients also allowed comparisons to be made between clinically important subgroups.
The allelic fixation (Fst) values were different among the three subgroups and varied from 0.194 to 0.277, suggesting higher genome compatibility among the genotypes, indicating that crosses made between the genotypes from these distinct subgroups would generate superior lines with better adaptability to moderate to severe drought conditions (N'Goran et al. 2000; Raju et al. 2016).
This placed limits on the ability to make comparisons between subgroups defined by these variables.
Related(15)
tested between subgroups
made between parts
made between clusters
made between populations
made between factors
made between people
made between parties
made between bloggers
made between species
made between objects
made between cohorts
made between farms
made between survivors
made between photos
made between groups
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com