macaques immunized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "macaques immunized with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or medical contexts when discussing the immunization of macaques, typically in research studies or experiments. Example: "The study focused on macaques immunized with a novel vaccine to assess its efficacy against the virus."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

31 human-written examples

By 4 weeks following primary immunization, macaques immunized with MVAΔudg-gag exhibited significantly greater frequencies of Gag-specific CD8 T cells, which produced IFNγ in response to Gag peptide stimulation, than did animals immunized with MVA-gag (MVAΔudg-gag: range = 0.04 0.39, median = 0.094; MVA-gag: range = 0.01 0.07, median = 0.033) (Figure 9A).

Plosone

We compared the HIV-1-specific cellular and humoral immune responses elicited in rhesus macaques immunized with two poxvirus vectors (NYVAC and ALVAC) expressing the same HIV-1 antigens from clade C, Env gp140 as a trimeric cell-released protein and a Gag-Pol-Nef polyprotein as Gag-induced virus-like particles (VLPs) (referred to as NYVAC-C and ALVAC-C).

Duke University

The results showed clear differences between the adjuvant-immunized animals and the cynomolgus macaques immunized with rLcrV, rV10, or rF1.

Plosone

Temporal analyses of virus replication, immune responses, and efficacy in rhesus macaques immunized with a live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus vaccine.

Duke University

The data show that sera from Rhesus macaques immunized with a single peptide react only with the homologous peptide while Rhesus macaques immunized with both peptides respond well to both peptides.

Journal of Immunological Methods

Macaques immunized with vectors expressing the MCP3-tagged fusion proteins developed stronger antibody responses.

Duke University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

29 human-written examples

Antibody fragments were isolated from the human naive antibody gene library HAL4/7 [35], [35] and an immune antibody gene library constructed from a macaque immunized with recombinant Crf2 protein.

Plosone

Single chain fragment variables (scFvs) were obtained by phage display from a human naive antibody gene library and an immune antibody gene library generated from a macaque immunized with recombinant Crf2.

Plosone

In this study, starting from a macaque immunized with the recombinant heavy chain of BoNT/A1 (BoNT/A1-HC), an immune antibody phage-display library was generated and antibody fragments (single chain Fragment variable) with nanomolar affinity were isolated and further characterized.

BMC Biotechnology

While the library was obtained from a macaque immunized with the RCA-A, it was panned with ricin since the whole toxin was our final target molecule.

BMC Biotechnology

In macaques immunized in combination with in vivo EP, we observed a 10- to 40-fold increase in HIV-specific enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses compared to those for macaques receiving a 5-fold higher dose of vaccine without in vivo EP.

Duke University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about scientific studies involving macaques, use the phrase "macaques immunized with" to clearly indicate that the animals received a specific immunogen. Always specify the immunogen and the route of administration for clarity.

Common error

Avoid vague descriptions of immunization protocols. Instead of stating "macaques were immunized", specify "macaques were immunized with [antigen] via [route]" to ensure reproducibility and clarity in scientific communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "macaques immunized with" serves as the subject and verb of a sentence, indicating that the macaques underwent an immunization process. Ludwig's examples show its use in describing experimental groups in scientific studies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

Academia

40%

News & Media

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "macaques immunized with" is a common and correct term used in scientific and medical literature to describe experiments where macaques are given a vaccine or immunogen. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. The phrase is predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts. When using this phrase, it's essential to provide specific details about the immunogen, dosage, and administration route to ensure clarity and reproducibility. Alternatives include "macaques vaccinated against" or "macaques inoculated with". Ludwig's examples provide a strong basis for understanding its proper usage in research contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

macaques vaccinated against

Changes "immunized with" to "vaccinated against", focusing on the protective action of the procedure.

macaques inoculated with

Replaces "immunized with" with "inoculated with", indicating a deliberate introduction of a substance to produce immunity.

macaques treated with a vaccine for

Uses "treated with a vaccine for", highlighting the therapeutic aspect of immunization.

macaques that received immunization with

Emphasizes that the macaques were the recipients of the immunization process.

macaques undergoing immunization with

Focuses on the process of immunization that the macaques are experiencing.

macaques given a vaccine of

Shifts the focus to the act of administering the vaccine.

macaques subjected to immunization using

Highlights the action performed on the macaques in a more clinical way.

macaques protected by immunization with

Stresses the outcome, focusing on the protection conferred by the immunization.

immunized macaques

Shortens the phrase to an adjective form describing the macaques.

macaques developed immunity through

Highlights the development of immunity rather than the act of immunization itself.

FAQs

How is "macaques immunized with" typically used in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, "macaques immunized with" is used to describe experimental setups where macaques are given a vaccine or immunogen to study their immune response or protection against a disease. It's important to follow this phrase with the specifics of what they were immunized with.

What are some alternatives to "macaques immunized with"?

Some alternatives include "macaques vaccinated against", "macaques inoculated with", or "macaques that received immunization with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to use "immunized" or "vaccinated" when referring to macaques?

While both "immunized" and "vaccinated" can be used, "vaccinated" typically implies the use of a vaccine, while "immunized" is broader and can include other methods of inducing immunity. In many cases, they are interchangeable, but specifying "macaques "vaccinated against"" may be clearer when a vaccine is used.

What details should I include when describing how "macaques were immunized with" a substance?

When describing the immunization process, include the specific antigen or vaccine used, the dosage, the route of administration (e.g., intramuscular, subcutaneous), the number of doses, and the time interval between doses. For example, "macaques were "immunized with" 50 μg of recombinant protein X via intramuscular injection at weeks 0, 4, and 24".